This maybe wrong thinking but I wonder if the keeping the fly further back is keeping it closer to the school? Basically that the troll hookup occurred as the lines passed over the school - so therefore the further back is "better". At least that's what I was thinking the times I starting stripping line off the reel to let the fly further back before beginning a retrieve. I know I've tried this multiple times but only vaguely remember hooking up once or twice. OTOH, I distinctly remember thinking WTF, why is everyone else hooked up and I'm not?!
Maybe the school is already gone, or maybe the aggressive fish peeled off and are chasing the flies being retrieved to the boat? Most likely I should just stop experimenting so much and just fish!
Oh man, so many rabbit holes to dig into in this thread haha. I apologize that I keep diving into these things, as I'm not entirely sure my thoughts make total sense at time, but I'm stuck at home on a dreary day today so whatever lol
I have so many thoughts regarding the distance that my gear is being trolled behind the boat. Over the years I have experimented with this a ton, but I have settled on a basic approach that works well for me and I like to stick with that. Mostly because I'm a big believer in keeping things as simple as possible, and eliminating variables.
If I'm running a 5 line spread, I like to run a W type spread. By that I mean, I run two short lines off each corner. I don't run them by specific distance, rather a free spool count of seconds. So with the boat in gear at full troll speed, I free spool those two short lines for 8 seconds. This puts them roughly 25-30' behind the boat, right in the wash. The two side rods in outriggers I do at 14-18 seconds. I vary this count based on water conditions, but the variables would be very difficult to type out.
The last rod is run straight out the back, basically directly between the two short corner rods, and I run that one waaaaaaay back. Like 25 seconds, often more. We call this the "shotgun" rod, and I like my shotgun rod way, way behind the boat.
I've run this basic spread since I was a deckhand, and to toot my own horn, my troll game is strong.
There is a very common thought in the albacore world that keeping the gear close to the boat is crucial, and trolling with gear too far back is a disadvantage. The thought being that if you're trolling and you hook a fish too far away from the boat, then it's going to make it difficult to really get those fish up and fired up at the boat because they were so far away when you first hooked up. I've just never once seen that to be the case. When I worked on the commercial boat we referred to our shortest lines as our "money lines". Not because they hooked more fish, but simply because it was so much faster to hook/land/unhook/redeploy jig with the short line than the longer ones. But without fail, our two longest lines hooked the most fish. It wasn't even close.
I always remembered that and started experimenting with it when I started decking. The first few captains I worked for insisted on keeping the gear tight to the boat, but my second year when I went to work for Ian he gave me full freedom to do what I wanted, so I started playing around with it which lead to the spread I've settled on today. Just like on the commercial boat, our long line was our top producer. Not every day of course, but over the course of the season it was the clear winner. And I've found that to be the case every single season I've worked since then. Without fail, black and purple cedar ran a mile behind the boat will hook up.
In all the time I experimented with that, mostly just slowly dropping that shotgun line back further and further, I never once encountered a scenario where I felt that the distance was in any way an inhibiting factor for really getting a baitstop going. Those fish can see so well, and swim so damned fast, that even if you catch the edge of a school 150' from the boat, those fish can be keyed on a small brail of anchovies in a second or two. If they don't respond in that scenario, I believe there is a very good chance they weren't going to respond no matter what.
I always, always, always run at least one line way off the boat. I absolutely hate the thought of running everything short and tight and putting all my eggs in one basket. I've hooked a ton of fish trolling right behind the boat, there is no doubt that its worth running some gear tight. However, I have NEVER experienced a scenario where running tight was the ONLY way to get hookups. On the flip side, I have seen many days where short lines flat out wouldn't get bit for whatever reason, but the long lines would. So since I've never found running long to be a disadvantage, I've never seen a reason not to incorporate it.
For a long time now I've been of the belief that the short lines consistently being bit is a sign of aggressive fish. In theory, those short lines are the first lines any fish are likely to see, and they don't have much time to consider a response. Trolling at 5 or 6 knots there isn't a lot of time from when they look up, to when the next set of lures is going to be going over the top of them, so if they immediately respond and smash the short lines I've always taken that as a sign of fish that are likely to be aggressive. On the other side of that coin, I feel like the days where only the shotgun rod gets bit, or occasionally an outrigger line, are a sign of fish that are a bit more weary. Again just in theory, but I always picture those fish down there doing their thing when we go over. They immediately look up and see those short lines and they think, eh, whatever. Next they see the mid lines, and again they're like eh, looks good but whatever. Then a few seconds later they see that stupid cedar plug go by, wobbling along, and one of them just can't help themselves and they give in to temptation. So maybe they weren't super fired up to begin with, but by the end of the parade of offerings at least one of them just can't resist.
Now, this is just the way I like to look at it, and I am in no way claiming to know what the hell I'm talking about. I've seen wide open bait stops that were initially started by a cedar plug hookup 250' behind the boat, and I've seen quite a few instances where both short corner rods instantly snap off, and then we stop and convert to bait and don't touch/see/mark another fish. So it's definitely nothing set in stone, just how I like to look at it. I like to cover all my bases in regards to distance from the boat, and I really don't see any reason not to.
These same concepts definitely apply to fishing with fly rods, though some things are a bit more difficult to match up precisely. On most fly trips I've done we have had 4 rods on board, so we don't run a 5 rod spread. We also can't free spool a fly reel in the same manner so it's not quite as easy to set them to specific distances. I like to run a similar spread minus the long rod out the back. Two shorter lines out the corner, and two longer off the sides. I can't claim to have been able to notice a lot of patterns when it comes to distance on fly trips, mainly because I am not as involved with the setting of the spread so at any given time I don't always know where everything is at. On gear trips, even though I'm not actually setting the spread most of the time, the deckhand knows exactly where I want them so I always know where everything is even if I didn't do it myself.
One big difference to me between fly trips, and our standard gear trips, is that for the most part people are super stoked to hook fish with fly rods to the point that people often start to really notice little differences. On any given gear trip we do, there may be one hot troll rod for any particular reason. Maybe the starboard outrigger with the Seahawks clone is constantly getting bit one day, or the port corner short rod with the Mexican flag mini clone another day. On these days I never, ever, ever change things up. I may notice one line is getting bit more than another, but I always chalk it up to a variety of variables so long that it's note even worth considering. I prefer to play the averages. Over the course of the season I see swings here and there, but I am confident that over the course of time keeping with what I believe in will pay off. And it does. The problem that comes in to play is that on gear trips, troll fish just aren't really a big deal. By that I mean, we aren't looking to catch a bunch of fish trolling. Ideally we hook just one fish trolling, then stop the boat and load up on live bait. Most people know this, and most people prefer to catch them on live bait. To the point that sometimes it's difficult to get people to get on the rod with the troll fish, because they just want to go straight to bait. Trolling is simply an ends to a mean, so nobody really cares too much.
Fly trips on the other hand, are different. People are engaged. They're holding their rods. They're setting the distance of their line. They maniuplate the line or the rod tip, giving it twitches and such. Doing all sorts of things that may, or may not change the results. When the bite does happen, the rod is in hand. The grab is felt. The adrenaline spike is instant. It's all a much cooler experience for a lot of people. It becomes more OF an experience in itself, if that makes sense. The desire to hook a fish becomes higher. I feel like on gear trips everyone wants a rod to go off, because of what it might lead to. On fly trips, people want their rod to go off because that in itself is pretty friggen rad. Add in the challenge that catching these fish on cast flies often presents, and it puts a higher emphasis on hooking troll fish, specifically to the individual. So what I've seen out there in roughly a thousand albacore trips means absolutely nothing to the only person on the boat who hasn't hooked a troll fish that day, or the person who has only hooked a single fish while standing next to Guy who hooks six. So this puts me in a weird spot where my day to day focus is based on averages, keeping things simple, and big picture but then I find myself trying to explain to the one guy onboard who hasn't hooked a troll fish that he hasn't done anything wrong, and I wouldn't change anything up. I've had this very conversation with a good many of you, and it's something I'm trying to really open my mind to. When I tell someone that I truly don't believe things like fly color matter, and that I wouldn't change flies if it was me, I truly believe that. I don't say that out of ill will. I believe that to the depths of my soul. But again, thats based on my own experiences and while the math may make sense over the course of many seasons being out there every day, it doesn't always add up in the sense of that one person who isn't hooking fish that particular day. I'm really trying to focus on expanding my perspective on things, and seeing things from others perspective this year and trying to find ways to approach those scenarios better.
My god these tuna threads make me ramble lol

