2025 Tuna and Exotics

This maybe wrong thinking but I wonder if the keeping the fly further back is keeping it closer to the school? Basically that the troll hookup occurred as the lines passed over the school - so therefore the further back is "better". At least that's what I was thinking the times I starting stripping line off the reel to let the fly further back before beginning a retrieve. I know I've tried this multiple times but only vaguely remember hooking up once or twice. OTOH, I distinctly remember thinking WTF, why is everyone else hooked up and I'm not?!
Maybe the school is already gone, or maybe the aggressive fish peeled off and are chasing the flies being retrieved to the boat? Most likely I should just stop experimenting so much and just fish!


Oh man, so many rabbit holes to dig into in this thread haha. I apologize that I keep diving into these things, as I'm not entirely sure my thoughts make total sense at time, but I'm stuck at home on a dreary day today so whatever lol

I have so many thoughts regarding the distance that my gear is being trolled behind the boat. Over the years I have experimented with this a ton, but I have settled on a basic approach that works well for me and I like to stick with that. Mostly because I'm a big believer in keeping things as simple as possible, and eliminating variables.

If I'm running a 5 line spread, I like to run a W type spread. By that I mean, I run two short lines off each corner. I don't run them by specific distance, rather a free spool count of seconds. So with the boat in gear at full troll speed, I free spool those two short lines for 8 seconds. This puts them roughly 25-30' behind the boat, right in the wash. The two side rods in outriggers I do at 14-18 seconds. I vary this count based on water conditions, but the variables would be very difficult to type out.
The last rod is run straight out the back, basically directly between the two short corner rods, and I run that one waaaaaaay back. Like 25 seconds, often more. We call this the "shotgun" rod, and I like my shotgun rod way, way behind the boat.

I've run this basic spread since I was a deckhand, and to toot my own horn, my troll game is strong.

There is a very common thought in the albacore world that keeping the gear close to the boat is crucial, and trolling with gear too far back is a disadvantage. The thought being that if you're trolling and you hook a fish too far away from the boat, then it's going to make it difficult to really get those fish up and fired up at the boat because they were so far away when you first hooked up. I've just never once seen that to be the case. When I worked on the commercial boat we referred to our shortest lines as our "money lines". Not because they hooked more fish, but simply because it was so much faster to hook/land/unhook/redeploy jig with the short line than the longer ones. But without fail, our two longest lines hooked the most fish. It wasn't even close.

I always remembered that and started experimenting with it when I started decking. The first few captains I worked for insisted on keeping the gear tight to the boat, but my second year when I went to work for Ian he gave me full freedom to do what I wanted, so I started playing around with it which lead to the spread I've settled on today. Just like on the commercial boat, our long line was our top producer. Not every day of course, but over the course of the season it was the clear winner. And I've found that to be the case every single season I've worked since then. Without fail, black and purple cedar ran a mile behind the boat will hook up.

In all the time I experimented with that, mostly just slowly dropping that shotgun line back further and further, I never once encountered a scenario where I felt that the distance was in any way an inhibiting factor for really getting a baitstop going. Those fish can see so well, and swim so damned fast, that even if you catch the edge of a school 150' from the boat, those fish can be keyed on a small brail of anchovies in a second or two. If they don't respond in that scenario, I believe there is a very good chance they weren't going to respond no matter what.

I always, always, always run at least one line way off the boat. I absolutely hate the thought of running everything short and tight and putting all my eggs in one basket. I've hooked a ton of fish trolling right behind the boat, there is no doubt that its worth running some gear tight. However, I have NEVER experienced a scenario where running tight was the ONLY way to get hookups. On the flip side, I have seen many days where short lines flat out wouldn't get bit for whatever reason, but the long lines would. So since I've never found running long to be a disadvantage, I've never seen a reason not to incorporate it.

For a long time now I've been of the belief that the short lines consistently being bit is a sign of aggressive fish. In theory, those short lines are the first lines any fish are likely to see, and they don't have much time to consider a response. Trolling at 5 or 6 knots there isn't a lot of time from when they look up, to when the next set of lures is going to be going over the top of them, so if they immediately respond and smash the short lines I've always taken that as a sign of fish that are likely to be aggressive. On the other side of that coin, I feel like the days where only the shotgun rod gets bit, or occasionally an outrigger line, are a sign of fish that are a bit more weary. Again just in theory, but I always picture those fish down there doing their thing when we go over. They immediately look up and see those short lines and they think, eh, whatever. Next they see the mid lines, and again they're like eh, looks good but whatever. Then a few seconds later they see that stupid cedar plug go by, wobbling along, and one of them just can't help themselves and they give in to temptation. So maybe they weren't super fired up to begin with, but by the end of the parade of offerings at least one of them just can't resist.

Now, this is just the way I like to look at it, and I am in no way claiming to know what the hell I'm talking about. I've seen wide open bait stops that were initially started by a cedar plug hookup 250' behind the boat, and I've seen quite a few instances where both short corner rods instantly snap off, and then we stop and convert to bait and don't touch/see/mark another fish. So it's definitely nothing set in stone, just how I like to look at it. I like to cover all my bases in regards to distance from the boat, and I really don't see any reason not to.

These same concepts definitely apply to fishing with fly rods, though some things are a bit more difficult to match up precisely. On most fly trips I've done we have had 4 rods on board, so we don't run a 5 rod spread. We also can't free spool a fly reel in the same manner so it's not quite as easy to set them to specific distances. I like to run a similar spread minus the long rod out the back. Two shorter lines out the corner, and two longer off the sides. I can't claim to have been able to notice a lot of patterns when it comes to distance on fly trips, mainly because I am not as involved with the setting of the spread so at any given time I don't always know where everything is at. On gear trips, even though I'm not actually setting the spread most of the time, the deckhand knows exactly where I want them so I always know where everything is even if I didn't do it myself.

One big difference to me between fly trips, and our standard gear trips, is that for the most part people are super stoked to hook fish with fly rods to the point that people often start to really notice little differences. On any given gear trip we do, there may be one hot troll rod for any particular reason. Maybe the starboard outrigger with the Seahawks clone is constantly getting bit one day, or the port corner short rod with the Mexican flag mini clone another day. On these days I never, ever, ever change things up. I may notice one line is getting bit more than another, but I always chalk it up to a variety of variables so long that it's note even worth considering. I prefer to play the averages. Over the course of the season I see swings here and there, but I am confident that over the course of time keeping with what I believe in will pay off. And it does. The problem that comes in to play is that on gear trips, troll fish just aren't really a big deal. By that I mean, we aren't looking to catch a bunch of fish trolling. Ideally we hook just one fish trolling, then stop the boat and load up on live bait. Most people know this, and most people prefer to catch them on live bait. To the point that sometimes it's difficult to get people to get on the rod with the troll fish, because they just want to go straight to bait. Trolling is simply an ends to a mean, so nobody really cares too much.

Fly trips on the other hand, are different. People are engaged. They're holding their rods. They're setting the distance of their line. They maniuplate the line or the rod tip, giving it twitches and such. Doing all sorts of things that may, or may not change the results. When the bite does happen, the rod is in hand. The grab is felt. The adrenaline spike is instant. It's all a much cooler experience for a lot of people. It becomes more OF an experience in itself, if that makes sense. The desire to hook a fish becomes higher. I feel like on gear trips everyone wants a rod to go off, because of what it might lead to. On fly trips, people want their rod to go off because that in itself is pretty friggen rad. Add in the challenge that catching these fish on cast flies often presents, and it puts a higher emphasis on hooking troll fish, specifically to the individual. So what I've seen out there in roughly a thousand albacore trips means absolutely nothing to the only person on the boat who hasn't hooked a troll fish that day, or the person who has only hooked a single fish while standing next to Guy who hooks six. So this puts me in a weird spot where my day to day focus is based on averages, keeping things simple, and big picture but then I find myself trying to explain to the one guy onboard who hasn't hooked a troll fish that he hasn't done anything wrong, and I wouldn't change anything up. I've had this very conversation with a good many of you, and it's something I'm trying to really open my mind to. When I tell someone that I truly don't believe things like fly color matter, and that I wouldn't change flies if it was me, I truly believe that. I don't say that out of ill will. I believe that to the depths of my soul. But again, thats based on my own experiences and while the math may make sense over the course of many seasons being out there every day, it doesn't always add up in the sense of that one person who isn't hooking fish that particular day. I'm really trying to focus on expanding my perspective on things, and seeing things from others perspective this year and trying to find ways to approach those scenarios better.

My god these tuna threads make me ramble lol
 
Keep rambling. This is great stuff. I can’t wait for September.
 
One thing to remember is that many mesopelagic fishes and invertebrates (squid, shrimp, krill) practice vertical migration. This phenomenon was first noted in WWII by ships that were using newly developed sonar systems to detect submarines; the sailors noted a layer that reflected sound that was not the true bottom - the deep scattering layer between 900 and 1600'. This deep scattering layer moved shallower at night. Some fish species that undergo vertical migration have swim bladders (especially myctophids = lanternfish), which are very good at reflecting sound.
During the day, these organisms are 1200-3000' below the surface in the "twilight" zone, too deep for visually-oriented predators like tuna to feed effectively. As the sun starts to set, they migrate up to the photic zone (top 600') to feed on the much more abundant prey there (phytoplankton, small copepods, etc.). [Once you get away from coastal waters and macroalgae, it is the photosynthesis done by microscopic phytoplankton (diatoms, dinoflagellates, photosynthetic bacteria like Prochlorococcus in that top 600' (often more like 200") that fuels the food chain all the way to the deep sea.]. As the sun starts to rise, they migrate back down from the surface to the mesopelagic zone. This migration is many thousands of body lengths each way for these small organisms - not cheap energetically. While there are other theories on the advantages of diet vertical migration, the most likely is to avoid visual predators by day. A full moon on a clear night might allow sufficient light for predators like tuna to exploit these vertical migrators.
fig2-hires.jpg

Steve
 
Last edited:
Back to my seemingly never ending search for the perfect popper head, I picked up some of these heads a while back. Actually only ended up with them because I ordered some other style to try but the shop emailed me that they were out of stock and suggested these as a replacement so I gave em a shot.

Not sure how these will fish, and I'm not sure how I feel about the size. They are very large. I had to use a pretty ridiculous hook. But after looking at it for a bit the overall profile isn't any larger than I'd want, just the head is a bit larger.

My goal is a pattern that will essentially fish like a Miyawaki popper, leaving just a steady V wake, while being large and buoyant enough to stay on top of the water through all the varying ocean conditions. Almost every head I've tried in the past just doesn't cut it. Typically they just aren't large enough to stay on top of the surface film in all but the flattest of conditions.

Wish I could effectively test these heads without actually being on the ocean, but I haven't figured out a way. It's frustrated to tie up a handful of flies only to discover they don't fish right on the big pond. So maybe going absurdly large is the answer lol

PSX_20250217_213846.jpg
 
Oh man, so many rabbit holes to dig into in this thread haha. I apologize that I keep diving into these things, as I'm not entirely sure my thoughts make total sense at time, but I'm stuck at home on a dreary day today so whatever lol

I have so many thoughts regarding the distance that my gear is being trolled behind the boat. Over the years I have experimented with this a ton, but I have settled on a basic approach that works well for me and I like to stick with that. Mostly because I'm a big believer in keeping things as simple as possible, and eliminating variables.

If I'm running a 5 line spread, I like to run a W type spread. By that I mean, I run two short lines off each corner. I don't run them by specific distance, rather a free spool count of seconds. So with the boat in gear at full troll speed, I free spool those two short lines for 8 seconds. This puts them roughly 25-30' behind the boat, right in the wash. The two side rods in outriggers I do at 14-18 seconds. I vary this count based on water conditions, but the variables would be very difficult to type out.
The last rod is run straight out the back, basically directly between the two short corner rods, and I run that one waaaaaaay back. Like 25 seconds, often more. We call this the "shotgun" rod, and I like my shotgun rod way, way behind the boat.

I've run this basic spread since I was a deckhand, and to toot my own horn, my troll game is strong.

There is a very common thought in the albacore world that keeping the gear close to the boat is crucial, and trolling with gear too far back is a disadvantage. The thought being that if you're trolling and you hook a fish too far away from the boat, then it's going to make it difficult to really get those fish up and fired up at the boat because they were so far away when you first hooked up. I've just never once seen that to be the case. When I worked on the commercial boat we referred to our shortest lines as our "money lines". Not because they hooked more fish, but simply because it was so much faster to hook/land/unhook/redeploy jig with the short line than the longer ones. But without fail, our two longest lines hooked the most fish. It wasn't even close.

I always remembered that and started experimenting with it when I started decking. The first few captains I worked for insisted on keeping the gear tight to the boat, but my second year when I went to work for Ian he gave me full freedom to do what I wanted, so I started playing around with it which lead to the spread I've settled on today. Just like on the commercial boat, our long line was our top producer. Not every day of course, but over the course of the season it was the clear winner. And I've found that to be the case every single season I've worked since then. Without fail, black and purple cedar ran a mile behind the boat will hook up.

In all the time I experimented with that, mostly just slowly dropping that shotgun line back further and further, I never once encountered a scenario where I felt that the distance was in any way an inhibiting factor for really getting a baitstop going. Those fish can see so well, and swim so damned fast, that even if you catch the edge of a school 150' from the boat, those fish can be keyed on a small brail of anchovies in a second or two. If they don't respond in that scenario, I believe there is a very good chance they weren't going to respond no matter what.

I always, always, always run at least one line way off the boat. I absolutely hate the thought of running everything short and tight and putting all my eggs in one basket. I've hooked a ton of fish trolling right behind the boat, there is no doubt that its worth running some gear tight. However, I have NEVER experienced a scenario where running tight was the ONLY way to get hookups. On the flip side, I have seen many days where short lines flat out wouldn't get bit for whatever reason, but the long lines would. So since I've never found running long to be a disadvantage, I've never seen a reason not to incorporate it.

For a long time now I've been of the belief that the short lines consistently being bit is a sign of aggressive fish. In theory, those short lines are the first lines any fish are likely to see, and they don't have much time to consider a response. Trolling at 5 or 6 knots there isn't a lot of time from when they look up, to when the next set of lures is going to be going over the top of them, so if they immediately respond and smash the short lines I've always taken that as a sign of fish that are likely to be aggressive. On the other side of that coin, I feel like the days where only the shotgun rod gets bit, or occasionally an outrigger line, are a sign of fish that are a bit more weary. Again just in theory, but I always picture those fish down there doing their thing when we go over. They immediately look up and see those short lines and they think, eh, whatever. Next they see the mid lines, and again they're like eh, looks good but whatever. Then a few seconds later they see that stupid cedar plug go by, wobbling along, and one of them just can't help themselves and they give in to temptation. So maybe they weren't super fired up to begin with, but by the end of the parade of offerings at least one of them just can't resist.

Now, this is just the way I like to look at it, and I am in no way claiming to know what the hell I'm talking about. I've seen wide open bait stops that were initially started by a cedar plug hookup 250' behind the boat, and I've seen quite a few instances where both short corner rods instantly snap off, and then we stop and convert to bait and don't touch/see/mark another fish. So it's definitely nothing set in stone, just how I like to look at it. I like to cover all my bases in regards to distance from the boat, and I really don't see any reason not to.

These same concepts definitely apply to fishing with fly rods, though some things are a bit more difficult to match up precisely. On most fly trips I've done we have had 4 rods on board, so we don't run a 5 rod spread. We also can't free spool a fly reel in the same manner so it's not quite as easy to set them to specific distances. I like to run a similar spread minus the long rod out the back. Two shorter lines out the corner, and two longer off the sides. I can't claim to have been able to notice a lot of patterns when it comes to distance on fly trips, mainly because I am not as involved with the setting of the spread so at any given time I don't always know where everything is at. On gear trips, even though I'm not actually setting the spread most of the time, the deckhand knows exactly where I want them so I always know where everything is even if I didn't do it myself.

One big difference to me between fly trips, and our standard gear trips, is that for the most part people are super stoked to hook fish with fly rods to the point that people often start to really notice little differences. On any given gear trip we do, there may be one hot troll rod for any particular reason. Maybe the starboard outrigger with the Seahawks clone is constantly getting bit one day, or the port corner short rod with the Mexican flag mini clone another day. On these days I never, ever, ever change things up. I may notice one line is getting bit more than another, but I always chalk it up to a variety of variables so long that it's note even worth considering. I prefer to play the averages. Over the course of the season I see swings here and there, but I am confident that over the course of time keeping with what I believe in will pay off. And it does. The problem that comes in to play is that on gear trips, troll fish just aren't really a big deal. By that I mean, we aren't looking to catch a bunch of fish trolling. Ideally we hook just one fish trolling, then stop the boat and load up on live bait. Most people know this, and most people prefer to catch them on live bait. To the point that sometimes it's difficult to get people to get on the rod with the troll fish, because they just want to go straight to bait. Trolling is simply an ends to a mean, so nobody really cares too much.

Fly trips on the other hand, are different. People are engaged. They're holding their rods. They're setting the distance of their line. They maniuplate the line or the rod tip, giving it twitches and such. Doing all sorts of things that may, or may not change the results. When the bite does happen, the rod is in hand. The grab is felt. The adrenaline spike is instant. It's all a much cooler experience for a lot of people. It becomes more OF an experience in itself, if that makes sense. The desire to hook a fish becomes higher. I feel like on gear trips everyone wants a rod to go off, because of what it might lead to. On fly trips, people want their rod to go off because that in itself is pretty friggen rad. Add in the challenge that catching these fish on cast flies often presents, and it puts a higher emphasis on hooking troll fish, specifically to the individual. So what I've seen out there in roughly a thousand albacore trips means absolutely nothing to the only person on the boat who hasn't hooked a troll fish that day, or the person who has only hooked a single fish while standing next to Guy who hooks six. So this puts me in a weird spot where my day to day focus is based on averages, keeping things simple, and big picture but then I find myself trying to explain to the one guy onboard who hasn't hooked a troll fish that he hasn't done anything wrong, and I wouldn't change anything up. I've had this very conversation with a good many of you, and it's something I'm trying to really open my mind to. When I tell someone that I truly don't believe things like fly color matter, and that I wouldn't change flies if it was me, I truly believe that. I don't say that out of ill will. I believe that to the depths of my soul. But again, thats based on my own experiences and while the math may make sense over the course of many seasons being out there every day, it doesn't always add up in the sense of that one person who isn't hooking fish that particular day. I'm really trying to focus on expanding my perspective on things, and seeing things from others perspective this year and trying to find ways to approach those scenarios better.

My god these tuna threads make me ramble lol

Ramble on my friend. I sometimes feel like my 2nd gen Scandahoovian genes have programmed me to fish for a living (knowing full well I couldn't really handle it) so reading this stuff is about the only way I can get a sense of what that that life would be like. While I mostly like my job, being stuck in a clean room is no substitute for the ocean.

As for what to tell the guy next to me with only one tuna, I would remind him there have been plenty of times I was the one trying to figure out why I'm low man on the score board, if not skunked outright. Not that I see it as a competition out there. At least between crew (team) members. That said, I'm all about competing with the rest of the fleet. Fly crews now have a rep to defend!

Bluewater stoke is starting early this year!!!
 
This works reaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaally well


Evan, I remember you talking about this last year, but I don't recall the details. How did you end up rigging up a gear rod with a head for trolling flies? I've got a few ideas, but honestly thinking it may be easier just to make an albright connection at the head and call it good. A swivel would be an option as well, but adding hardware into potential tangles is never ideal on a charter.

I think ideally I'd set up a troll reel with braid, then an albright knot to the T14 or whatever..... The problem is I don't typically like to run braid on my troll reels, just because braid doesn't play well with our outrigger clips so if I set up a rod with braid to a head then it would kinda limit that rod placement to one of the short corner rods. I want to be able to run that setup either short in the corners, or longer out an outrigger, so I'd like to keep that option open so I'll likely just stick with mono.

Anyway, just hoping you could touch on how you set that up last year and if there is anything you'd do differently.
 
Evan, I remember you talking about this last year, but I don't recall the details. How did you end up rigging up a gear rod with a head for trolling flies? I've got a few ideas, but honestly thinking it may be easier just to make an albright connection at the head and call it good. A swivel would be an option as well, but adding hardware into potential tangles is never ideal on a charter.

I think ideally I'd set up a troll reel with braid, then an albright knot to the T14 or whatever..... The problem is I don't typically like to run braid on my troll reels, just because braid doesn't play well with our outrigger clips so if I set up a rod with braid to a head then it would kinda limit that rod placement to one of the short corner rods. I want to be able to run that setup either short in the corners, or longer out an outrigger, so I'd like to keep that option open so I'll likely just stick with mono.

Anyway, just hoping you could touch on how you set that up last year and if there is anything you'd do differently.
I can't remember the connection I used for braid to sink tip. I want to say it's a Crazy Alberto because I use that one so much. I have the rod in the 2nd story of my storage shed and I'm too lazy to pull it out and pull the head off. I'm using 20' of Airflo CCT470 which is like T-28. I don't even think they make it anymore. I grabbed a bunch before it all went away and I had easy access to such things due to work. From there it's just like a fly rod. Sinking line up to the fluoro leader to the fly. No swivels or hardware involved.
 
I can't remember the connection I used for braid to sink tip. I want to say it's a Crazy Alberto because I use that one so much. I have the rod in the 2nd story of my storage shed and I'm too lazy to pull it out and pull the head off. I'm using 20' of Airflo CCT470 which is like T-28. I don't even think they make it anymore. I grabbed a bunch before it all went away and I had easy access to such things due to work. From there it's just like a fly rod. Sinking line up to the fluoro leader to the fly. No swivels or hardware involved.

Not sure everyone is picking up the underlying idea this setup is emulating the random, wavy motions a fly line imparts to the fly. I'm assuming shorter leaders for this to maximize line action (kinda same concept as running a hoochie 18" behind a flasher). I typically run straight 4' 25# FC, but troll hookups aren't my main objective (I also don't object to them!). Thoughts?
 
Not sure everyone is picking up the underlying idea with this setup is emulating the random, wavy motions a fly line imparts to the fly. I'm assuming shorter leaders for this to maximize line action (kinda same concept as running a hoochie 18" behind a flasher). I typically run straight 4' 25# FC, but troll hookups aren't my main objective (I also don't object to them!). Thoughts?
On that note, that's also why I opted for a pretty long piece of sinking material. If you go with like 10', I don't think that's going to be long enough to give that wavy action.
 
@Nick Clayton , so far, I've gotten through where you're talking about potential moon....I'll read the rest in a little bit but need to get this down before I forget. Have you ever paid attention to the time at which you're actually catching them en masse on a given day? I do wonder how that would correlate to moon phase (not actual monthly phase, but daily phases of majors and minors). Obviously that wouldn't be the only thing, but one thing I've noticed when musky fishing is that I encounter far more fish and get far more eats around daily majors and minors of the moon....now, that can last as little as 15 min or in one case, it was nearly 4 hours straight, but timing checked out. Obviously there will be outliers just like any population, but just curious what your observations are in that regard with tuna.

Oh, I wouldn't have minded one bit if you woulda yelled at me to stop casting/dumping/waiting, then stripping back up and to just cast and strip....seriously. For some reason that was stuck in my head to keep doing even though it wasn't working... :rolleyes:


I think I saw your original post prior to your edit, and I didn't get the notice that you had tagged me, so I'm just now seeing this full post.

To be perfectly honest, I can't say that I've ever paid that close attention to the moon. I tend to notice when the moon is full, but other than that I really don't pay much attention to it. I think mostly because at that point I'm just going every day, and its easy to just get tunnel vision ya know?

I most definitely notice patterns in fish behavior that might be interesting to compare to the moon if I can remember to do so. Just about every season we go through periods where the best fishing is happening at certain parts of the day. Sometimes we get out there and the over night boats will report a strong morning bite that petered out by the time we got on scene, and then things are slow for the bulk of the day. This is typically not something that just happens for a day, but will happen for seveal days, or a week or more. Then at some point things will shift and that early morning bite seems like it will start a bit later, and later in the day. The same applies for slow mornings/strong afternoons. Seems like I frequently see periods of this as well. I've never noticed any direct correlation to the moon in terms of a full moon or not, but I've never paid much attention specifically to what the moon is doing beyond that during those periods. I'll have to try to pay a bit more attention this year!
 
Bluewater stoke is starting early this year!!!
Agree. I was just out there at Westport with the fam and friends for a long weekend and it was odd walking by floats 14/16 and they’re mostly empty with no ARSC boats. I saw a couple of @Cabezon ’s loons.
I can't remember the connection I used for braid to sink tip. I want to say it's a Crazy Alberto because I use that one so much. I have the rod in the 2nd story of my storage shed and I'm too lazy to pull it out and pull the head off. I'm using 20' of Airflo CCT470 which is like T-28. I don't even think they make it anymore. I grabbed a bunch before it all went away and I had easy access to such things due to work. From there it's just like a fly rod. Sinking line up to the fluoro leader to the fly. No swivels or hardware involved.
I was gonna say that connection seems like the place for an FG knot which I don’t actually know how to tie but the Crazy Alberto looks like one that even a doofus like me could get to work.
 
And BTW, I'm totally OK with you yelling "GUY!!! GET YOUR ASS TO THE BOW AND CAST NOW!!!"


This reminded me of a funny moment from last season.....


Wes from Patrick's Fly Shop booked 2 days in a row for the last few years. Last year his first day was a group of 4, then 1 or 2 of them switched out for different folks the next day. Anyway, day 1 we had a pretty solid day. I think we had around 20 fish, with probably 12 of them caught casting. Wes is an incredible fly caster and top notch fisherman and had a stellar day. That night they apparently went out and Wes and one of the other guys closed down the Knotty Pine. Wes, to put it mildly, was in bad shape that next morning.

So we make it offshore and start trolling. After a few minutes Wes hands his rod off to Cal, and comes and stretches out on a bench in the cabin and kinda curls up and passes out. . So we troll along for a short while, when I look ahead and spot a very large log. Easily the largest log I saw all season. Now this was right during the time period where there was an absurd amount of yellowtail being encountered, so I was quite excited to come across this log. I jumped out of my seat and hollered "Hey Wes.... Are you alive???" He wakes up and says "Kind of". I replied "Can you cast a fly?" and he says "Ya, I think so".

So I told him to grab his rod and run to the bow and get ready to cast at this log that I was coming up on. So he pops up, grabs his rod and gets to the bow just as I was getting close. He stood ready to make a cast when I gave him the signal. I got about 75' from the log, hollered for Cal to throw some bait, and pulled the throttle back. Wes makes a single back cast, and shoots a cast directly across the top of the log, and the fly lands about 15' on the other side of it. So, from a near dead sleep, he was able to run to the bow, and with one back cast throw conservatively 85' of fly line. It was one of the more impressive things I've seen, and I was certainly not expecting it.

Naturally, he starts stripping and shortly after comes tight as he fly sinks right into the side of the log. All we could do was laugh as we moved closer to get the fly back, hoping we didn't see a flash of fleeing YTs. Of everything that I could have expected to go wrong in that scenario, him making TOO good of a cast was just not on my radar lol. It was impressive as hell, and quite funny.
 
I was gonna say that connection seems like the place for an FG knot which I don’t actually know how to tie but the Crazy Alberto looks like one that even a doofus like me could get to work.


FG is a cool knot. I've done it a few times but can't say I know it too well. Alberto is good too. My go to for braid/mono type connections is what I've always called the RP knot. Very similar to the Alberto. I use it on heavier stuff too. Works great for backing/fly line, and I use it for tuna cord to braid on my downrigger setups. Once you get the steps of one of those versions down, they are pretty darn easy to whip out.
 
This reminded me of a funny moment from last season.....


Wes from Patrick's Fly Shop booked 2 days in a row for the last few years. Last year his first day was a group of 4, then 1 or 2 of them switched out for different folks the next day. Anyway, day 1 we had a pretty solid day. I think we had around 20 fish, with probably 12 of them caught casting. Wes is an incredible fly caster and top notch fisherman and had a stellar day. That night they apparently went out and Wes and one of the other guys closed down the Knotty Pine. Wes, to put it mildly, was in bad shape that next morning.

So we make it offshore and start trolling. After a few minutes Wes hands his rod off to Cal, and comes and stretches out on a bench in the cabin and kinda curls up and passes out. . So we troll along for a short while, when I look ahead and spot a very large log. Easily the largest log I saw all season. Now this was right during the time period where there was an absurd amount of yellowtail being encountered, so I was quite excited to come across this log. I jumped out of my seat and hollered "Hey Wes.... Are you alive???" He wakes up and says "Kind of". I replied "Can you cast a fly?" and he says "Ya, I think so".

So I told him to grab his rod and run to the bow and get ready to cast at this log that I was coming up on. So he pops up, grabs his rod and gets to the bow just as I was getting close. He stood ready to make a cast when I gave him the signal. I got about 75' from the log, hollered for Cal to throw some bait, and pulled the throttle back. Wes makes a single back cast, and shoots a cast directly across the top of the log, and the fly lands about 15' on the other side of it. So, from a near dead sleep, he was able to run to the bow, and with one back cast throw conservatively 85' of fly line. It was one of the more impressive things I've seen, and I was certainly not expecting it.

Naturally, he starts stripping and shortly after comes tight as he fly sinks right into the side of the log. All we could do was laugh as we moved closer to get the fly back, hoping we didn't see a flash of fleeing YTs. Of everything that I could have expected to go wrong in that scenario, him making TOO good of a cast was just not on my radar lol. It was impressive as hell, and quite funny.
Top notch story. Now when you put it in your memoir/saltwater charter Tell-all NYTimes bestselling mostly nonfiction book, “Cabin Confidential,” he just needs to hook a fish on the other side of the log which then wraps on a submerged branch, comes loose and then he lodges the fly into the log. 😁
 
FG is a cool knot. I've done it a few times but can't say I know it too well. Alberto is good too. My go to for braid/mono type connections is what I've always called the RP knot. Very similar to the Alberto. I use it on heavier stuff too. Works great for backing/fly line, and I use it for tuna cord to braid on my downrigger setups. Once you get the steps of one of those versions down, they are pretty darn easy to whip out.
What I tie might actually be the RP. They're super similar.. Not sure I even know the difference. I can just never remember the name RP for some reason.
 
What I tie might actually be the RP. They're super similar.. Not sure I even know the difference. I can just never remember the name RP for some reason.

If I remember right, the alberto is 7 wraps down, then 7 wraps back up and through the original loop then tight?

The RP is similar, but it's 5 wraps down, 5 wraps up, then the tag end is wrapped through and around the original loop twice before pulled tight. The actual Albright is somewhere in there too. I too get them confused often. I'd venture a guess that there isn't a huge difference between any of the versions.
 
If I remember right, the alberto is 7 wraps down, then 7 wraps back up and through the original loop then tight?

The RP is similar, but it's 5 wraps down, 5 wraps up, then the tag end is wrapped through and around the original loop twice before pulled tight. The actual Albright is somewhere in there too. I too get them confused often. I'd venture a guess that there isn't a huge difference between any of the versions.
Albright is only one layer of wraps then back through the loop I think.

I mean, I could look it up online and find out... but that sounds like a lot of work. Better to just speculate.
 
Looking at the FG again, I’m not sure that this is a good application for it. It might dig into the T line coating and just strip it right off the core, depending how the T line is constructed. The doubled-over knots like RP or CA might actually be better for the T line.

 
Back
Top