"...invasive species... and a "small number" of salmon"
Unspecified species and number =
Spin?
Salmon in Lake Washington during August are likely returning adult fish rather than smolts. Either is bad.
This is a 1500 VDC power distribution system for a $712M light rail project over a bridge, floating on a waterway used by migrating ESA listed fish.
The anodes for the (24VDC? - "Impressed Current) Cathodic Protection (ICCP)" system reportedly "rested on the lakebed." After the dead fish were discovered the anodes were raised up from the lakebed.
Several search results for variations of: "how would fish and swimmers be affected by anodes resting on the lakebed from a transit bridge floating on a lake for an impressed current cathodic protection system of a 1500vdc transit line" turns up some deadly serious issues if there is a system design (Low Vt anode proximity, High Vt isolation) fault or other failure.
And there is not much difference in the potential hazards between "resting on the lakebed" or "suspended".
I wonder how this was addressed and what testing was specified in the EIS?