Biden bans logging roads in much of America’s largest national forest (WAPO)

kmudgn

Life of the Party

Pics did not copy, don't why

Biden bans logging roads in much of America’s largest national forest​

White House reinstates protections in Tongass National Forest that were undone by Trump; move aims to protect fish and a giant carbon sink​

imrs.php

By Timothy Puko



The Biden administration on Wednesday restored protections for more than half of Alaska’s Tongass National Forest, safeguarding one of the world’s largest intact temperate rainforests from new roads and logging.


The Tongass is a relatively pristine expanse in the state’s southeast that has been the focus of a long fight between environmentalists and Alaskan timber interests. State leaders had persuaded the Trump administration in 2020 to open it up to new roads and logging, undoing protections dating to the Clinton era, in a bid to boost economic development.

Biden administration officials said Wednesday that the forest is vital both for wildlife habitat — especially fish — and fighting climate change. The administration’s decision, through the U.S. Department of Agriculture, will repeal the 2020 Alaska Roadless Rule, making it illegal again for logging companies to build roads and cut and remove timber throughout more than 9.3 million acres of forest.




“The Tongass National Forest is key to conserving biodiversity and addressing the climate crisis,” Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said in a statement. “Restoring roadless protections listens to the voices of Tribal Nations and the people of Southeast Alaska while recognizing the importance of fishing and tourism to the region’s economy.”
The rule is scheduled for publication in the Federal Register on Friday and goes into effect immediately, a department spokesman said.
The forest is known for plentiful salmon runs, imposing fjords and ancient trees, which are critical for trapping and storing carbon dioxide to mitigate climate change, the department said. Tongass trees absorb at least 8 percent of all the carbon stored in the entire Lower 48’s forests.

Alaska’s governor and Republicans in its congressional delegation have previously criticized the proposal, first announced in November 2021. They have said it would hurt the timber industry.



“This ruling is a huge loss for Alaskans,” Gov. Mike Dunleavy said Wednesday in a tweet. “Alaskans deserve access to the resources that the Tongass provides — jobs, renewable energy resources and tourism, not a government plan that treats human beings within a working forest like an invasive species.”
This tree has stood here for 500 years. Will it be sold for $17,500?
But advocates for more protection and the Biden administration emphasized that the forest plays a huge role supporting Alaska’s fishing industry, a much larger employer in the state than the timber industry. Scientists have identified the Tongass as an ecological oasis providing key habitat for wild Pacific salmon and trout.

Restoring protections was popular with Alaska Native leaders, environmentalists and tour operators, who said that preserving the region’s remaining wild landscapes will sustain the state’s economy in the long term. The Forest Service received about 112,000 comment documents, most in favor of restoring roadless protections, the Agriculture Department said Wednesday.



Tongass habitat is also crucial for Sitka black-tailed deer, among many other species. It boasts the highest density of brown bears in North America, and some of its trees are between 300 and 1,000 years old, and as tall as 17-story buildings.
“The Tongass Roadless Rule is important to everyone,” said Joel Jackson, president of the Organized Village of Kake, which sits on the forest edge on an island south of the capital, Juneau.
“The old-growth timber is a carbon sink, one of the best in the world,” Jackson said in a statement. “It’s important to OUR WAY OF LIFE — the streams, salmon, deer, and all the forest animals and plants.”
 
Alaska’s governor and Republicans in its congressional delegation have previously criticized the proposal, first announced in November 2021. They have said it would hurt the timber industry.
Logging in Alaska's Tongass National Forest is so expensive that it returns only $0.10 for every dollar the USFS spends on logging roads and administration. It would be cheaper for U.S. taxpayers just send AK loggers a weekly paycheck to NOT log the forest. This is from old news I read about logging in the Tongass years ago.
 
I am no friend to the logging industry, neither am I friend of government control of everything.
I wonder what impact this might or might not have on forest fire fighting should such a tragedy occur..
 
I am no friend to the logging industry, neither am I friend of government control of everything.
I wonder what impact this might or might not have on forest fire fighting should such a tragedy occur..
That forest had been doing fine without roads for a few million years, I think it will be fine without roads going forward. My attitude toward old growth forests is to let them do their thing. Let them burn occasionally, no fire suppression, and leave them alone.
 
Sounds like good news. Hopefully there are plans to remove all culverts and riparian structures as part of the decommissioning with the intent of keeping the area natural. Left behind they can cause fish passage and erosion problems. There is probably a big budget line item for that, but we too often see a good idea not executed well.
 
The places that i go to in Gifford Pinchot are not paved . Many of the logging roads are dug out and bouldered or gated to prevent access anymore. Logging has been curtailed already for years. Roads and their condition have been degrading for lack of forest funding too. The announcement makes it sound like something substantial is being done is all. If it sounds good make a pronouncement.
Hi Capt'n,

Maybe I'm misunderstanding, I thought this was about not building roads into roadless areas. There are not very many big chunks of roadless areas left, so I'm in favor of protecting them.
If this news is about ripping roads in previously roaded and logged areas, I agree with @Tom Butler .
Roads and their condition have been degrading for lack of forest funding too
I get that. In the 1990s, the FS wanted to log the hell out of the Clearwater NF. The area around the Jack and Noble timber sales connects the Gospel Hump, Selway-Bitteroot, and Frank Church RONR wildernesses. The proposed "salvage" timber sales were below cost, with us taxpayers paying way more to build the roads than the sale price. Taxpayer subsidized fragmentation of big roadless habitat. That pissed me off.

But, Idaho County is about 90% federal land. Not much private property tax base. Timbersale kickbacks pay for roads, schools, and services. No timber sales, no kickbacks, and fewer jobs.

Tough issues for sure. But, you know, "in wildness is the preservation of the world" and "the first rule of intelligent tinkering is to keep all the parts."

I think preserving the few remaining wild, unroaded places, in big enough chunks to be resilient, is wise.

I'm not sure what "
The announcement makes it sound like something substantial is being done is all. If it sounds good make a pronouncement.

means. In my view, protecting the Tongass from roads and logging is doing something substantial.
 
Last edited:
I was under the impression he is just reinstating protections that only the last administration "canceled".
Could be.
I think you're correct, it's kind of hard searching details since I'm not really familiar with the area, and a couple paragraphs don't always give the info I'm looking for. I was thinking more wilderness area like the Bob, but it seems it's more a road building ban targeting logging roads, because road building may still be allowed by exception.
I found this interesting, does it read in an odd way to anyone else?
"A common refrain from critics of the Roadless Rule is that it hinders needed development in the area. It doesn’t. Since 2001, every single one of the 57 requests from developers to be exempted from the rule for their needed projects in Alaska has been approved. Allowances have been made for mining, certain road building, personal tree cutting, interties, hydroelectric projects and geothermal leases. When politicians say it’s hindering development, it’s not true. " https://www.seacc.org/our-work/roadless-tongass/

This is curious to me, because in our GIS text several versions ago (2015? or so) we did a project of tree inventory of 5 tracts in the Tongass, doing nest protection setbacks, stream setbacks, and so on, and then calculated harvestable timber.
 
Last edited:
My questionable comprehension. Momentary impulsive blather about someone somewhere from someplace. I didn’t think I heard voices from 1972 at the Gifford Pinchot Regional office? Or just a brain fart?
 
There in lies the motive…
It has nothing to do with the environment, but is purely political.🤦🏼‍♂️

Correct, it's a conspiracy of those on the so-called "Left" to deny everyone their freedom, take away their everyones guns, and indoctrinate them with CRT. Nobodies motives are what they at first appear, you must dig deeper to find the conspiracy and only a select few have a full understanding of how this conspiracy that involves thousands of individuals actually works - I think some guy named Q gets it. :LOL:

Question, if it's purely political for Biden to reverse a decision back to an original decision made under President Obama, what was the rationale for the original decision?

Cheers
 
Back
Top