Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
An excellent plan!T rex populations will be managed based on county populations. The trick is keeping the county rex in its respective county. Obviously some more populous counties with less survival oriented humans will attract more attention. Yet we feel once the kill rate weeds out the slow, stupid, and inattentive the rex population will naturally balance and human attention to survival will regain the path of survival of the fittest. I mean is this not what we are talking about. The over grazing problem is a human problem as well. Just think of the new purpose that the homeless drug addicted population will have when actively hunted by an apex predator. They will no longer occupy open park spaces and shit it up as the Rex hunts there where it's size is an advantage. And drugs? There is no drug like life and death being so intimately perceived. A little bit of near death makes everyone thankful for life and probably more willing to put the glass pipe down. Parks will recover. Sidewalks will be clean. Crime will go down. Lenient judges will be replaced by the ultimate judge, the county Rex. He cares not of your record, your sobriety, your family name. He only cares for the calories you might provide. Judge, jury, and executioner in the most unbiased primal sense. I think it's beautiful. Just like wolves doing what they do. I'm starting a rex advocacy group.
Let's just be real. Wolves are being used as a pawn in a social cultural war. If they piss ranchers and rural people off then the self righteous urbanites are for them. Whatever it takes to hurt the percieved other side. Wolves are a cultural touchstone to people that will likely never see one or be in a place with a chance to see one. This is the same "owning the libs" garbage the right pulls in reverse. I think we are all adults here and can see that while it's not the entirety of things going on here but at a minimum a nice bonus for owning the other side. Personally I think people that live in a place should have the greatest say over what goes on there as far as intervention. Wolves would be quietly repatriating lots of places as they already are without introductions etc. But the fanfare and glee of owning political rivals is so tasty they gotta litigate and push it. People love inflicting pain on their percieved rivals. It's stupid and juvenile. But hey that's the schoolyard mentality that dominates these days in this state.That's been one of my frustrations with WWF and the more zealous of wolf advocates. They've chosen the route of litigation and bureaucracy and put ranchers in a difficult position. Gotta have flaggers, ranch riders, audio deterrents and more in place, and then you get to kill the wolf. It would be a hell of a lot cheaper, and leave the ranchers indifferent to the wolves, if the people who wanted the wolves there would just compensate them for what the wolves killed.
It boils down to "wolves for thee and not for me" coming from dense population centers where wolves will never exist. They want money spent relocating wolves to someplace else, money spent protecting them, money spent monitoring them. If they were willing to compensate for the damage wolves do, they may find the wolves need much less protection from people.
I spend a lot of time in Stevens county. People there don't just hate wolves. Most ive talked to think they're awesome, but are also losing their pets and are afraid to let their kids out at times. They're dealing with the actual repercussions of wolves on the landscape, but you won't see WWF out there building wolf proof fencing or supplying guardian dogs to the people there.
You will see them bringing the full force of the law down on someone who takes out a wolf that hangs out where their kids play.
Zealots are a silly breed.
Zealots are a silly breed.
I had enough trouble with 1/2 dozen goats, no thanks.T Rex would be awesome, but their too big n dumb, the Velociraptor would be a much better choice!
Tamp down the aggro, MAPA...
MAKE AMERICA PEACEFUL AGAIN !!!!
ToyPoodles, lots of Toy Poodles...released everywhere, and Golden Retrievers...and balls, tennis balls and stuffed animals with squeakers.
Who would oppose that ?
![]()
Gotta watch out for those beavers too
I think i can get on board with that. There's a moral superiority thread to both of them. Or maybe a practical ignorance to it, where they don't recognize the struggle of the other as valid. Either way, it results in a desire to punish the other for the way they view things.Let's just be real. Wolves are being used as a pawn in a social cultural war. If they piss ranchers and rural people off then the self righteous urbanites are for them. Whatever it takes to hurt the percieved other side. Wolves are a cultural touchstone to people that will likely never see one or be in a place with a chance to see one. This is the same "owning the libs" garbage the right pulls in reverse. I think we are all adults here and can see that while it's not the entirety of things going on here but at a minimum a nice bonus for owning the other side. Personally I think people that live in a place should have the greatest say over what goes on there as far as intervention. Wolves would be quietly repatriating lots of places as they already are without introductions etc. But the fanfare and glee of owning political rivals is so tasty they gotta litigate and push it. People love inflicting pain on their percieved rivals. It's stupid and juvenile. But hey that's the schoolyard mentality that dominates these days in this state.
Now bring it home to something you are a bit more passionate about and feel like you have the best information. Let's say hatchery versus wild. This is how we end up with money being spent in court that could go to better and an undesirable end result.I think i can get on board with that. There's a moral superiority thread to both of them. Or maybe a practical ignorance to it, where they don't recognize the struggle of the other as valid. Either way, it results in a desire to punish the other for the way they view things.
Wolves belong on the landscape! Wolves cause problems for humans! Both of these statements are true! We should find a solution other than places being exclusively human or wolf occupied.