DerekWhipple
Steelhead
While I believe in the idea of a rod manufacturer having an unconditional warranty, as evidenced on this board and plenty of other industry stories, there has been so much abuse of warranties in the industry. I don't blame rod manufacturers at all for wanting to tighten up who gets to send back a rod for warranty.Thanks Jake.
Its weird to me that if its a true Winston, and its bought new, why would it not be honored? Somehow Costco got the Winston rods, if they are indeed true Winston Rods. Those rods had to have come from Winston. Just doesnt seem right not to honor a warranty, no matter how a consumer obtained it, as long as it was obtained legally. As mentioned above, at some point in time, Winston shipped a massive order to Costco, or maybe to another third party. Those rods were most likely not made any different from the ones sold to authorized dealers.
Bob
And related to another post, while I also agree that keeping it "manufacturer to fly shop only" allows inflated prices, the other alternative of a rod manufacturer selling any number of rods to anyone who buys them starts to send the company down the rabbit hole of gearing their business to large customers, so to keep Wal-Mart as a customer, costs have to be repeatedly cut, and then eventually a $99 Winston rod made overseas is your only option from them.