Ready to pay for weather reports and forecasts?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rick Santorum introduced the National Weather Service Duties Act of 2005, which aimed to prohibit the National Weather Service from releasing weather data to the public without charge where private-sector entities perform the same function commercially. He was a Senator from Pennsylvania at the time, where the Weather Channel was located, which was to be the obvious beneficiary of the proposal.
So... 20 years of trying to privatize something taxpayers developed over decades is now coming to fruition for the folks that brought you...absolutely fucking nothing...but are ready to start charging you for what you paid for.

You're getting fucked here, by those same people...certainly you can see that.

...And so it goes....
 
I forecast that this thread will be political weather you like it or not...
 
I accept the challenge ---> I will not get political.
 
I don't think it's a political statement to say that something as critical to public safety as weather forecasts should be widely available and free, so I'll say it.
Perfectly acceptable thing to say. Keep the mud slinging and personal attacks away and we can continue with civil discourse.
 
I'm sure people in areas that demand accurate forecasts (coastal areas, tornado alleys, etc) for both recreation and survival will have a 'pro' level option . . .at a price. This is bullshit no matter what party or entity proposes it. We pay federal taxes . . . for what??? Foreign aid, bribes, payoffs etc. What about using it for services that benefit everyone like NWS/weather alerts? I'm surely be branded a Communist for suggesting something so radical.
 
We have seen what lack of proper warning can lead to; in Texas, the state legislature also rejected a bill that would have updated emergency early warning systems. If the first purpose of government is not about protecting the people, then I'm not sure what it is.
 
Business interests have always wanted to get their claws into the public coffers, the military industrial complex having been the most successful at it, with billions in weapon system contracts that were nothing more than massive pork barrels - we're into the F-35 for over 2 Trillion dollars with planes that remain too problematic to put into front line readiness, the Zumwalt class destroyers were contracted out for 32 scheduled builds, and US taxpayers ended up with only three at a cost of over 8 billion dollars a piece, and remain so highly problematic they are not considered front line ready, etc, etc.
Social Security has always been the apex target, with effort after effort to privatize the funds so money managers can make billions off of managing those funds 'for us'.
The recent attempt to pass a bill to sell 3 billion acres of public land would have had little return to taxpayers, it was solely designed to provide land for cheap to developers and corporations who would make billions on development projects.
What has changed is the raw openness of these current scams. Openly appointing private industry players with zero operational experience to be put in charge of departments within the US government with the sole intent to reduce and eliminate the services those departments provide and replace them with contracted services provided by the industries the appointees have a financial interest in.
Such scams work best when politics are sufficiently polarized by keeping the social war of 'us vs them' at sufficient fevered pitch that US taxpayer attention is kept on the polarization theatrics instead of the actions of the scammers and grifters who are fleecing us.
 
Even to the poorly educated, it has to be clear by now that these people are gutting the treasury and the government to line their own pockets, and will be going after any and all public money in an attempt to divert the tax funds to their bank accounts.
How fucking dumb do you have to be not to see it ?

Welll...anyone...
 
Just gonna lock this now because we're already averaging to discussing things that aren't the original topic and toeing the line of the mud slinging we have a zero tolerance rule for. These discussions, and all subsequent replies, per forum rules, must stay related to things that affect fishing and hunting DIRECTLY. Not broader systematic issues.

I don't have time to moderate right now, and don't see this getting back on track.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top