I've been wondering a lot about nuclear, and I'm wondering if our current model for how they work (huge plant/facility over thousands of acres) isn't the primary issue that we have faced.
We have nuclear plants in every submarine and battleship now and I am assuming that's safe for the people on board. If we dont need to have a significant physical distance from the generators then potentially we do not need to operate an enormous facility out in BFE. No need for a Hanford if we could have many smaller plants throughout a city.
I love seeing energy become more electricity oriented. Not because of a green agenda and a hatred of oil, but because of the energy independence it offers citizens. Theoretically people can manufacture and store electricity at the individual level. A solar panel and a water tower could be in backyards one day acting as a mechanical battery for smooth electricity generation.
The infrastructure of oil is unobtainable to the individual. Even if it were, the ability to store and transport that energy is severely limited by the weight and volatility of petroleum products.
I remember reading
@iveofione (I believe) on the old site talking about his Jackerys. While they arent perfect yet, the ability to carry several days worth of electricity and power in a little box is absolutely mindblowing. What might that look like in 10 years? 50?
That's why I believe in electric cars and such. All power/fuel can be converted to electricity. But I cant make internal combustion happen from solar. Cant turn nuclear power into gasoline.