More dams being removed across the country = more fish habitat

Josh

Dead in the water
Staff member
Admin
Here's an article on how dam removal is increasing in the USA after passage of the bipartisan $1T infrastructure bill in 2021. The article itself talks about the Shulls Mill Dam on the Watauga River in NC. This dam removal was more for the protection of the awesomely named (but extremely weird looking) "Hellbender" salamander than fish. But with a name like that, I'm on board.


There's a neat interactive map on the article showing all dams removed in the USA over the past 25 years. You can hover over each dot to see the name and date of removal. Here's a non-interactive screenshot.

Screenshot 2024-08-22 at 9.32.03 AM.png

Any time an outdated or badly designed dam comes down, I view it as a victory. No, I'm not against all dams, at least not until we sort out clean energy to replace hydro power and the other things that dams do give us. But I tend to believe in the ideas that UW professor David Montgomery talks about in the DamNation video that Felt Soul Media did a few years back:
"Like all constructed things, dams have a finite lifetime. And it's not time to pull out every dam in the country, that would be economically foolish. But it would be just as foolish not to rethink every dam in the country and try and decide which are the ones that actually make sense in the 21st century. And which are those that we can get more value out of, both economically and culturally, aesthetically, morally, and ecologically, out of a river system, by sending it partway back to the state it was in naturally."

I rewatch this last section of DamNation from time to time because it gives me hope that we'll see more rivers run free in our lifetimes.

 
Just my opinion.
The oldest dam in Oregon should have been removed many years ago, but no the damn thing just keeps being repaired at the cost of living fish.
Damn shame.
Damn dams
 
Which dam is that?
Winchester (I suspect)
And I kindly disagree. All one has to do is look at the historical data…there is a stretch (with no hatchery plants) and the data contradicts the dam removal proponents’ opinion. Just so the self-righteous social elites can have the river to themselves…all the while pounding the hell out of the fish holding in the waters below the fishes natal streams waiting for the Fall rains.
 
Last edited:
Winchester (I suspect)
And I kindly disagree. All one has to do is look at the historical data…there is a stretch (with no hatchery plants) and the data contradicts the dam removal proponents’ opinion. Just so the self-righteous social elites can have the river to themselves…all the while pounding the hell out of the fish holding in the waters below the fishes natal streams for the Fall rains.
I'm pretty much not into a pissing match about agreeing or disagreeing about that dam (Winchester) on the N. Umpqua river.
I think that dam should have been removed before the first repair was done.
I also think there is not enough public access to the N. Umpqua river down stream from Glide.
I'm not a drift boat kinda guy, walk and wade is more my game.
That's enough out of me, thanks
 
Back
Top