Salmo I have thought about how to reply as I really do get it.
MSH does not work and that is self-evident. Instead of managing for maximum harvest I want the escapement of fish equal to or slightly more than capacity. With a downward sliding scale every year the runs keep diminishing. Yes, there is the ocean and loss of habitat but what I want to correct is over harvest, that I define as harvesting too many fish and not allow the carrying capacity to be met.
If people want their cake and eat it too then let's just open it wide as it can go with catch and no season and just get it over with rather than a slow death by a thousand cuts.
My other big objection is when a run is far larger than expected and the commercials are given X number of days to harvest with no limit as to numbers taken. This is easy to monitor but total BS. I think it was the Makaws were given 3 o4 days to fish Kings a few springs ago thinking of a small harvest and every boat on the beach went out and when the water quit dripping they had greatly surpassed the number expected and it affected everyone down the line. Then there is the debacle of the roe fishery on Chums out in front of the Snohomish of few years back. No limit on numbers harvested just number of days fishing. Chum are almost non -existent in the Snoqualmie and it had a nice run of decent sized Chum willing to double you rod. MSH at its finest!!
Then there is the true cod fishery that once existed in the Sound. The netters figured out most of the cod came down the west side of Vashon Island and they were given basically free reign to net them. That was what 30 years ago maybe more, It has been a long time since any numbers of True Cod have been seen in mid or south Sound and that too is MSH .
I concede Salmo I really don't get it and MSH "science" is infallible. I have learned the errors of my ways and so I now sing out gill nets forever!
Dave