Budget 4wt shorty recs?

TLDR: Which 8ft 2in – 8ft 8in 4wt would you buy for $350 or under? 90% single dry fly, walk and wade, biggest rivers around the size of upper Yak (Easton)/middle Metolius (Wizard Falls), experienced angler who is used to midrange/premium rods, needs to be able to throw longer casts (50-ish ft) very occasionally, not super-fast though. Not interested in glass.

I know these "what should I get posts" can be annoying, so feel free to ignore ;) but I'm bored in the winter so cut me some slack. I've tried to give relevant info on experience, water size, fish size, and technique--again, feel free to ignore :p


I’m daydreaming about getting a 4wt shorty, under 9’ over 8’, but have a limited budget ($350 tops) and specific criteria. Wondering if anyone here has thoughts. I tend to fish medium rivers and always on foot. I started fly fishing in my early teens and after a break have been back at it for over 20 years. I lived far from good trout fishing between 2008-2022, but still typically got let’s say 14 days a year in, with most of those days being 9+ hours of fishing. Not an expert caster but can do most of what I want to do.

My current main rod is a 9’ 5wt Sky G, backup 5wt is an old Orvis Trident TLS 8’6” tip flex. My creeking rod is an old 3wt 7’6” Winston Ibis, and I have a Vision Nymphmaniac 11’ 3wt Euro rod. I’m good on 3wts! Before the Sky G, I used a 10’ 4wt Helios 2 as my main.

General applications: Small flies, trout between 14” and 19,” realistically. I don’t need this rod to fish indicator rigs or streamers. The occasional small Perdigon (16 max) from a 14 or 12 dry maybe. I rarely need to exceed 40’ and don’t need to make huge mends.

Why a 8’ 6”(-ish) 4wt? I’m into light tackle (not afraid of 6x tippet), single small dries (let’s say 14-22), and decent presentation. I’ve fished long 4s and short (older) 5s, but never a short 4wt so I’m wondering if it might be my sweet spot. At the same time, I don’t want to sell the Sky G and the two non-Euro rods probably have negligible value, so the budget for the short 4wt is what it is.
Further considerations: Aesthetics aren’t important, but it’d be nice if it doesn’t look like complete sh*t or at least if it had reasonable build quality. Warranty isn’t really important to me at this price, and TBH I’ve only ever had one rod break in 25-ish years. Ideally, the rod would hold a little value for 2-3 years if I decide it’s not for me or really want to upgrade. At this price point, there’s only so much value to be held of course, but I imagine a used Maxcatch rod will be worth almost nothing. Weight isn’t super important either and obviously you’re not getting ultralight at these prices.

A note on the inevitable “go to the shop and try them” comment: The closest legit fly shop to me is over half an hour away. Legit fly shops typically only carry one budget brand, and it’s almost always Echo around here. So yes, I will test cast a Carbon XL and the Orvis Clearwater. But I’m not sure any fly shops within an hour even carry the Aetos, for example, or Greys rods, etc. So even though they’re not obscure rods, I’m unlikely to find them in person.


Following are rods I’ve looked at. As noted, only a few of them will be test-castable so I’m interested in hearing if anyone owns or has used any of them.
  • Taylor Dynamix 8’ 6” 4wt
  • San Juan Frying Pan 8’ 6” 4wt
  • Fenwick Aetos 8’ 6” 4wt
  • Orvis Clearwater 8’ 6” 4wt
  • Echo Carbon XL 8’ 4” 4wt
  • Redington CT 8’ 6” 4wt (hesitant on this one due to distance issues)
  • Redington Vice 8’ 6” 4wt
  • TFO Dispatch 8’ 6” 4wt
  • TFO Blue Ribbon 8’ 6” 4wt
  • TFO Pro III 8’ 6” 4wt (hesitant on this one due to distance issues)
  • Douglas ERA 8’8” 4wt
  • Greys Lance 8’ 4wt (too short?)
Would love to hear any thoughts on a specific rod here or others I should consider.
 
Since you are bored and want more ideas ---> Have you considered 'used'? For your price point you can step up to Winston, Scott (G and G2 series), T&T, Loomis (IM6 and GLX series), Sage (RPL or maybe even a LL series)....

Many of these are medium/moderate action and are great for what you want to fish. Also, they hold their value, unlike a new rod....
 
Last edited:
My concern with the Classic Trout is that the 8’6” 4wt will be realistically limited to 40ft or so. That’s mostly ok, but ideally the option to get a bit more line speed on occasion would be great. Is this a reasonable concern?
 
My concern with the Classic Trout is that the 8’6” 4wt will be realistically limited to 40ft or so. That’s mostly ok, but ideally the option to get a bit more line speed on occasion would be great. Is this a reasonable concern?

You might consider 'tuning' your casting technique/stroke with some lessons....
 
My concern with the Classic Trout is that the 8’6” 4wt will be realistically limited to 40ft or so. That’s mostly ok, but ideally the option to get a bit more line speed on occasion would be great. Is this a reasonable concern?
I would think that any water you're wanting a short 8 wt for, you're not gonna be making casts more than 30' or so. FWIW, for the 5 wt challenge they tested at distances of 20'-50' for the dry fly section. The Classic Trout ranked #4 of 26 in that division. The rods that ranked above it were 2 Winstons and a Sage.
 
I would think that any water you're wanting a short 8 wt for, you're not gonna be making casts more than 30' or so. FWIW, for the 5 wt challenge they tested at distances of 20'-50' for the dry fly section. The Classic Trout ranked #4 of 26 in that division. The rods that ranked above it were 2 Winstons and a Sage.
I've read the YA Challenge, but as you note that's a 9' 5wt. The reason for the occasional longs casts is that when I can, I wet wade. It's correct to say that most casts won't need to be long, and it won't be the case that there are a lot of long casts, but I worry that a rod built to mimic rods of 30 years ago and that's closer to glass than a modern fast graphite rod will simply not have the requisite stiffness to throw a longer cast with decent accuracy now and then. I'd lean moderate-fast for my use case.

Maybe a good way to put this is: Often when we buy a 9' 5wt we want versatility: something that can used for dries, hopper droppers, indicators, and even some streamers. I'm not interested in that kind of versatility here, but I would like a rod that can work decently well at the longer end of what we can reasonably expect out of a 8'+ 4wt. This gives me versatility in what I can fish.

My concern with the CT, not having tested it, is that because it flexes deep and is modeled on rods we'd now call slow, it might effectively limit what I can do even on skinnier water.
 
I've read the YA Challenge, but as you note that's a 9' 5wt. The reason for the occasional longs casts is that when I can, I wet wade. It's correct to say that most casts won't need to be long, and it won't be the case that there are a lot of long casts, but I worry that a rod built to mimic rods of 30 years ago and that's closer to glass than a modern fast graphite rod will simply not have the requisite stiffness to throw a longer cast with decent accuracy now and then. I'd lean moderate-fast for my use case.

Maybe a good way to put this is: Often when we buy a 9' 5wt we want versatility: something that can used for dries, hopper droppers, indicators, and even some streamers. I'm not interested in that kind of versatility here, but I would like a rod that can work decently well at the longer end of what we can reasonably expect out of a 8'+ 4wt. This gives me versatility in what I can fish.

My concern with the CT, not having tested it, is that because it flexes deep and is modeled on rods we'd now call slow, it might effectively limit what I can do even on skinnier water.
Otherwise, the CT seems like the perfect choice as folks have mentioned here.
 
Since you are bored and want more ideas ---> Have you considered 'used'? For your price point you can step up to Winston, Scott (G and G2 series), T&T, Loomis (IM6 and GLX series), Sage (RPL or maybe even a LL series)....

Many of these are medium/moderate action and are great for what you want to fish. Also, they hold their value, unlike a new rod....
RCF is spot on.
In the last few weeks the following 8'6" 4wts have all sold on the auction site under your $350 budget: Winston BIIIX, Sage SLT, Orvis Recon, Sage Mod, plus lots of others. You might put out a WTB for 8'6" 4wt and see what is offered up.
 
Since you are bored and want more ideas ---> Have you considered 'used'? For your price point you can step up to Winston, Scott (G and G2 series), T&T, Loomis (IM6 and GLX series), Sage (RPL or maybe even a LL series)....

Many of these are medium/moderate action and are great for what you want to fish. Also, they hold their value, unlike a new rod....
This is the way.
 
I have fly fished via wet wading for over 50 years. My preferred methodology for sure. I have fished the Yak, Tway and the creek near 'The Merc' and many spring creeks for all of those years. I have fished Winston's IM6/WT, Loomis' IM6/IMX/GLX, Sage RPL and Scott Original G series a lot. Some may call these slow, especially when compared to the fast 'broomsticks' nowadays. In my opinion, the rods I fished are moderate to moderate-fast action depending on the manufacturer and model. Maybe it is a generational thingy, but I have not had any issues getting the line and fly out 'there' accurately. I also prefer the softer tip and deep bending for both protecting the tippet and playing the fish. That is what I grew up on and continue to fish.

I agree, fiberglass and bamboo are not to my liking. Each to our own....

Sounds like CT is the direction you are heading. Go for it! I suggest buying a used one, in case it does not meet expectations.
 
RCF gave some great advice from your specifications outlined in your original post.....honestly, you gave yourself some great advice in your original post. I will say, however, if you feel like any of the aforementioned 4wt rods won't allow you to cast 40', it ain't the rod.

The CT is an outstanding performer in that 8'6" 4wt. As stated, the used market can be great too.

Not totally sure why you'd rule out a modern glass 4wt for the type of fishing you're describing. That's literally what it's designed for....but totally get it, great performing, reasonably priced & tough as nails fly rods aren't for everyone.
 
A moderate flex rod loads easier for shorter cast and when needed you can muscle it for longer ones. You might be surprised how well a 7’6” or 8’ rod cast. If you over line them 1 or 2 weights they preform better for close in work by loading on a shorter back cast, something to think about on smaller streams..
 
I have an 8'6" IMX Pro. I got it off eBay new when they first came out around $300. I only use it for stockers on lakes. It can cast 50' if it's not windy out. I think finding a used rod might be a good option since you're not worried about the warranty anyhow.
 
RCF gave some great advice from your specifications outlined in your original post.....honestly, you gave yourself some great advice in your original post. I will say, however, if you feel like any of the aforementioned 4wt rods won't allow you to cast 40', it ain't the rod.

The CT is an outstanding performer in that 8'6" 4wt. As stated, the used market can be great too.

Not totally sure why you'd rule out a modern glass 4wt for the type of fishing you're describing. That's literally what it's designed for....but totally get it, great performing, reasonably priced & tough as nails fly rods aren't for everyone.
Sorry, guess I wasn’t clear. I can cast with distance without double hauling on a 9’ 5wt, a 10’ 4wt, and an 8’ 6” 5wt.

It’s not a matter of is it possible or can I cast. It’s a matter of a budget short 4wt that can perform decently 40-60ft when needed.

Making it get out there, not forcing the rod, and having a decent presentation are different things no?
 
Sorry, guess I wasn’t clear. I can cast with distance without double hauling on a 9’ 5wt, a 10’ 4wt, and an 8’ 6” 5wt.

It’s not a matter of is it possible or can I cast. It’s a matter of a budget short 4wt that can perform decently 40-60ft when needed.

Making it get out there, not forcing the rod, and having a decent presentation are different things no?
Yes, and IMO my 8’6” 4 weight CT starts to “fold” with 4 weight lines when I push casts out past 50 feet or so. It gets mushy. And I really enjoy that rod for dry fly trout fishing. So, I think maybe you’re right and you might want to look for a used higher end rod that has more “booty” for occasional distance.
 
RCF gave some great advice from your specifications outlined in your original post.....honestly, you gave yourself some great advice in your original post. I will say, however, if you feel like any of the aforementioned 4wt rods won't allow you to cast 40', it ain't the rod.

The CT is an outstanding performer in that 8'6" 4wt. As stated, the used market can be great too.

Not totally sure why you'd rule out a modern glass 4wt for the type of fishing you're describing. That's literally what it's designed for....but totally get it, great performing, reasonably priced & tough as nails fly rods aren't for everyone.
I agree, a forty-foot cast with an 8' rod breaks down to this - rod 8', line 23', leader 9'. I don't know of any modern rod that can't cast 23' of fly line. Your concern about the rod not having enough power tells me you are not a good candidate for a moderate action rod. Look for something used - fast with feel - Hardy Zenith, Scott Radian, Orvis H2. Those are the rods that will bring you joy.
 
It’s a matter of a budget short 4wt that can perform decently 40-60ft when needed.

Making it get out there, not forcing the rod, and having a decent presentation are different things no?
And then there's mending...
 
Back
Top