While wade fishing last Friday, I had my Simms waterproof chest pack separate at the seam resulting in losing several items of my gear to the river current ( I did save my fly boxes).
I submitted a claim to Simms for warranty repair or replacement evaluation and received this email this afternoon:
Thank you for submitting your item for a warranty and repair evaluation. At Simms, we stand behind our materials and craftsmanship. If your Simms product fails due to a defect, we are committed to repairing or replacing it and getting you back on the water as soon as possible.
After a thorough evaluation by our team of experts, we have determined that your product failed for reasons other than defects or workmanship or materials. We are unable to complete a repair that meets our performance standards or the product exhibits normal wear and tear.
Due to the age of the bag, we are unable to issue a replacement.
This bag was purchased in 2011 and was stored in a climate controlled extra bedroom closet and used very minimal. My question to the board members is; Am I being unrealistic to think Simms should take some blame for the bonding/delamination of the two materials since it was claimed to be a waterproof product. Or is 14 years of ownership of a product a valid claim for denial?
I submitted a claim to Simms for warranty repair or replacement evaluation and received this email this afternoon:
Thank you for submitting your item for a warranty and repair evaluation. At Simms, we stand behind our materials and craftsmanship. If your Simms product fails due to a defect, we are committed to repairing or replacing it and getting you back on the water as soon as possible.
After a thorough evaluation by our team of experts, we have determined that your product failed for reasons other than defects or workmanship or materials. We are unable to complete a repair that meets our performance standards or the product exhibits normal wear and tear.
Due to the age of the bag, we are unable to issue a replacement.
This bag was purchased in 2011 and was stored in a climate controlled extra bedroom closet and used very minimal. My question to the board members is; Am I being unrealistic to think Simms should take some blame for the bonding/delamination of the two materials since it was claimed to be a waterproof product. Or is 14 years of ownership of a product a valid claim for denial?