Lies, damned lies, and statistics.
Fish, wildlife and people *will* be impacted by the snowpack deficit, if not already.
Where is Cliff's analysis of soil moisture and aquifer levels? How about streamflows, which are also low low low?
https://waterdata.usgs.gov/wa/nwis/rt
edit: heck, even cliff's US precipitation map is based on modeled data, and from 1961 to 1990! All the old-timers around here keep saying how things have changed since then. Climate is often evaluated in 30-year cycles. Cliff is showing data from over 30 years ago! And statements about that outdated data like "We live in one of the wettest locations in the U.S. (see map). A region that possesses a very modest population considering the carrying capacity of the land and one that generally receives much more precipitation than we need or can use, with the surplus water surging out into the Pacific." lack a whole lot of nuance. All that alleged "surplus" water is absolutely doing work in the environment--the critters that live here evolved along with that hydrologic cycle.
Or how about this load from Cliff? "What about predicted forecast river levels at the end of summer (mid-September)? Around 80-90% for the Columbia and around 65-80% for the Yakima. Much higher for rivers in Oregon. Nothing serious." LOL great examples, Cliff. You picked the two most heavily managed and dammed rivers in the state. Let's see how the Stilly or nearly any other west side river is doing in mid-September 2024--I guaran-damn-tee you, none of us here will say it's "nothing serious" at that time. Lies, damned lies, and statistics.