As a sports fan I most enjoy watching and rooting for teams where I feel some connection to the athletes, the ones who came close last year and returned to see if they can finish the job. Having a new roster every year of unfamiliar names coached by the latest big bucks hire destroys any continuity and will, personally, make it improbable to feel any team loyalty and will likely destroy my desire to consistently want to watch the games. A diversion that was once found entertaining has been taken away by predicating success on financial renumeration. I'm going to miss it.
I’m not against players getting paid above and beyond the free education, room, and board. The bloviated amount of money the schools and NCAA pocketed annually off the football programs is/was nauseatingly insane. And yes, there’s not going to be parity with this. Oregon is not going to fall back into football oblivion, pre Phil Night wanting his fancy bauble. The Oregon’s, TAMU’s, Georgia, Bamas, Michigans, Ohio States, and all blue bloods will just stockpile more talent because of unlimited donor funds. However I think there’s another tier of teams who’s donor base may tire of tossing millions upon millions each year at 18-23 year old kids who themselves have no loyalty. Those are the Miamis, Washington’s, and Arizonas who spent huge amounts to load up a roster with mercenaries and not get the results they ultimately want ( kudos to the dogs for almost making it work perfectly). But, how much of a stomach are these donor groups going to have and for how long, if their team doesn’t put the revolving door of players together and get to the promised land? Again, Huskies tasted it, almost executed it to perfection, but despite the fat checks that core group of players who came back to try to win it all (and let’s face it, aided by fat checks), they just barely fell short. Arizona’s 10-wins and dramatic turnaround from a horrible program to a 10-win team? It’s not because Jed Fisch is the second coming of Bear Bryant. He’s a good coach who has a donor base who wrote ALOT of big checks to buy a good team.
Maybe this organically mellows itself out because donors just get tired of the arms race. I mean, it’s really not a smart investment. But then again I look at it from a poor man/fan perspective.
It’s brought the typical slimey antics the the top. Brock Hhatd reported right after the AC that Cam Ward had no less than 10, one-million dollar NIL offers. Specially one of the tenants of NIL was that players or their families were not to be contacted prior to the portal opening by agents of another school’s team. Well duh, that got ignored as fast as most of my steelhead swung offerings and the worthless, toothless NCAA does nothing to attempt to enforce it. How does that translate into the field to a player if he knows he may want to avoid contact and injury if a possible fat bag of cash may be coming his way from next season’s highest bidder? I know my eyebrows raised a time or two with a few of Cam Ward’s choices later in the Coug season last year.
So Abula, I feel your pain. I think the average fan who wants to feel that connection to be able to root for a specific school and those players is finding it harder to get behind this new scenario where there is no loyalty from the teams (coaches or players). People will just simply start tuning out. Only until the greedy networks feel the pain in their returns because the average fan says “why shouldn’t I go trim the grass even if my team is on ESPN this afternoon”, advertisers start seeing fast-declining eyeball numbers and subsequently their bean counters question the billions spent peddling insurance, soda, chips, ED drugs and Ram trucks, will there be any reigning in of this chaos (including realignment).
I’m far less attached than I had been for 40-plus years. And that’s not so bad.