Easy to talk when you don’t have to walk.Then push on to Moscow.
There is no way NATO can allow this chapter of history to close with Putin or his cronies in control of Moscow. Without Russian regime change NATO is a complete failure.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Easy to talk when you don’t have to walk.Then push on to Moscow.
There is no way NATO can allow this chapter of history to close with Putin or his cronies in control of Moscow. Without Russian regime change NATO is a complete failure.
Wow. No offense, but I needed a score card to keep track ....This article absolutely nails what is going on with Putin and Russia, an excellent read:
![]()
The Weakness of the Despot
An expert on Stalin discusses Putin, Russia, and the West.www.newyorker.com
ThisEasy to talk when you don’t have to walk.
With nuclear weapons in play we are all walking.Easy to talk when you don’t have to walk.
Just out of curiosity Rob, what was your MOS?Then push on to Moscow.
There is no way NATO can allow this chapter of history to close with Putin or his cronies in control of Moscow. Without Russian regime change NATO is a complete failure.
Selfish non joiner.Just out of curiosity Rob, what was your MOS?
Has anyone forgotten how useless our government was in preventing the taking of Crimea? Putin hasnt, and he's counting on it again here.
Just speculation here, but I think NATO rationalized Russia's need for an ice-free winter seaport, making it easier on everyone to accommodate Russia's aggression. In hindsight, if the rationale were just, and I'm not one qualified to judge one way or the other, then some kind of international easement agreement might have avoided annexation. But only if seaport access were Putin's true motivation, and hindsight tells us now that may not have been the case.Our presidential administrations at that time were basically a rubber stamp. We, the US, could have done a lot more than just stand on the sidelines and wring our hands while Putin invaded. By doing so, those administrations just went ahead and gave him a pass to do whatever he wanted. A pass that he is now using to invade another, sovereign neighbor.
Our presidential administrations at that time were basically a rubber stamp. We, the US, could have done a lot more than just stand on the sidelines and wring our hands while Putin invaded. By doing so, those administrations just went ahead and gave him a pass to do whatever he wanted. A pass that he is now using to invade another, sovereign neighbor.
Has anyone forgotten how useless our government was in preventing the taking of Crimea? Putin hasnt, and he's counting on it again here.
Putin hasn't flinched in his demands for demilitarization of Ukraine and ceding territory. Given all the analyses I have no reason to think he will change his mind. Putin has always been indifferent to the conditions of Russian citizenry, and he is concerned only with himself. If these things are true, Putin will take Ukraine eventually, and when he gets near that objective, if not before, he will begin attacking the Baltic nations. The whole world's watching, but the whole world needs to act. Like it or not, and who likes it?, but I think we're witnessing the beginning of WWIII. I can't see how declaring a no-fly zone in Ukraine at some future date is better for Europe and N. America than doing so now. It's inevitable unless NATO decides to accede to Putin's ambition to restore the USSR.
From what I read, the Russian anti aircraft missiles based inside Russia can cover about 2/3rds of Ukraines airspace. The problem then becomes evident, effective enforcement. Somebody is going to have to strike Russian territory with bombs and missiles to realistically make an effort to secure the airspace.I can't see how declaring a no-fly zone in Ukraine at some future date is better for Europe and N. America than doing so now. It's inevitable unless NATO decides to accede to Putin's ambition to restore the USSR.