Voluntary Trip Report program
The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) is working to increase angler participation in our Voluntary Trip Report (VTR) program in all
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks for the link. Unfortunately this volunteer reporting form appears specific to boat angling. There isn't a place to indicate that the reported data is specific to beach anglers.![]()
Voluntary Trip Report program
The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) is working to increase angler participation in our Voluntary Trip Report (VTR) program in allwdfw.wa.gov

Thanks for the contact information. I will reach out to WDFW to inquire about obtaining past and possible future shore based Puget Sound salmon catch data.Contact WDFW about the VTR program and how to make useable for shore fisheries, whether beach or pier.
PM sent
I think beach-only, no boats happened in MA11 in 2023 during the pink run too, right? If I remember right that was also to limit chinook impacts. I wonder what went into that decision.There are sometimes fish checkers at PNP, marrowstone, and Wilson parking lots. Maybe a couple times per year. Official MA9 beach fishing data does exist, and I am sure WDFW has lots of clarity about how few mature kings are encountered from the beach each year. Bet it's less than some of the piers for sure.
I also note that I have repeatedly raised the possibility of longer "beach only fishing" seasons in July (as well as october fishing) during NOF public comment meetings, and while WDFW seems to say "we will model and consider that", i have never seen any movement toward beach only fishing other than that short sept. period of 2017ish When MA9 went beach only for a couple weeks.
True, I forgot about that.I think beach-only, no boats happened in MA11 in 2023 during the pink run too, right? If I remember right that was also to limit chinook impacts. I wonder what went into that decision.
I'm not a Washingtonian but have you guys thought about organizing into a beach angler's advocacy group to speak together in one voice? After I retired, I spent a couple of years as a volunteer lobbyist for Humboldt Area Saltwater Anglers (HASA) headquartered out of Eureka, California. We met with state officials, tribal representatives, attended PFMC meetings and provided representation for our group. California's ocean salmon stocks get divvied up between Cape Falcon and Monterey Bay. Some years it can be quite a fight for the scraps. Before HASA organized, much of California's share of the quota went the SF Bay Area thanks to their advocacy group (Coastside Fishing Club). I'm no longer involved with HASA but I do know that CA DFW still regularly seeks their input on various ocean recreational fisheries issues. HASA is a non profit and has an annual dinner to raise money to cover travel expenses for their representatives.
That said, I'm not sure how Washington would respond/interact with such a group.
Brian - I did a little reading up on the PS Sport Fishery Advisory Group and you guys definitely need representation. Beach anglers seem to be a growing demographic that deserve a place in this group. It would be a good way for you to kick off your retirement plus how can WDFW refuse an application from the Founding Member of the 2025 Pink Opposition Party?Good idea Bob.
I wonder how or if a boatless beach angler might be accepted on the PS Sport Fishing Advisory Group?
If I recall correctly, applications or nominees should take place again this fall. I’ll be retired and will have a lot more time, so I plan to apply.
SF
SF-Brian - I did a little reading up on the PS Sport Fishery Advisory Group and you guys definitely need representation. Beach anglers seem to be a growing demographic that deserve a place in this group. It would be a good way for you to kick off your retirement plus how can WDFW refuse an application from the Founding Member of the 2025 Pink Opposition Party?