Intermediate camo lines

the_grube

the_grube

Life of the Party
Forum Supporter
I have the RIO aqualux intermediate. Really like the line, casts well and it's pretty tangle free if I stretch it before each session. Thinking about getting a camo-lux for off-color water, those summer days with gin clear water. I've heard good things about the Cortland camo intermediate. It's also considerable less expensive. Anyone have experience with both lines able to share and contrast them. Thanks
 
I like the RIO, Airflo, and SA intermediate lines better than Cortland’s camo. But lots of people swear by the Cortland. And you’re right about the price.

My experience with Cortland camo is worse coiling, more tangles in the running line, and a generally “sticky” texture. I bought one 15 years ago and took it off my reel after a few outings.
 
Ive got the Cortland clear camo in 4, 5, & 6 wt. It's by far my favorite line for lake fishing with no issues.
 
I agree with @troutpocket for all the same reasons. The Cortland camo was not my favorite. I gave mine away.
SF
 
Stonedfish said:
I agree with @troutpocket for all the same reasons. The Cortland camo was not my favorite. I gave mine away.
SF
Click to expand...
I have an old Cortland Clear intermediate that I have had for years, yes - it tends to have memory but if I stretch it as I'm pulling line off the reel then it's like a nylon leader that needed stretching. I love this old line, sinkls slowly and has put a lot of fish in the net and it casts nicely on my Sage 590-2 Fli. I hope I like the Cortland Camo that's due to arrive Monday.
 
Last edited:
Buzzy said:
I have an old Cortland Clear intermediate that I have had for years, yes - it tends to have memory but if I stretch it as I'm pulling line off the reel then it's like a nylon leader that needed stretching. I love this old line, sinkls slowly and has put a lot of fish in the net and it casts nicely on my Sage 590-2 Fli. I hope I like the Cortland Camo that's due to arrive Monday.
Click to expand...
Be interested to hear what you think of the new camo line. I hope it contributes it's share to the net as well.
 
two 9 wt. rods rigged with Cortland Camo Clear intermediate's were my go to for King's in tidewater, lines proved bulletproof while taking dozens of brutes, and a 6 wt CCC has long been my go to for lake fishing.
For any new line gently stretch the max working distance before spooling it on, removes latent coiling problems.
 
The only intermediate line I fish is a Cortland Clear Camo. I have used it for at least 10 years. Put a lot of trout in the net.
 
MELinOre said:
The only intermediate line I fish is a Cortland Clear Camo. I have used it for at least 10 years. Put a lot of trout in the net.
Click to expand...
Mel, you put a lot of trout in the net but it's not because of your line. It's that scraggly cali pattern is my guess.

I wonder if Cortland changed something recently? My old CCC was a fav, but when it got wrecked last year the new CCC was a PITA.

Maybe they changed the core?
 
Interesting stuff... So, do folks think that it's important to have a clear intermediate (like the aqualux) AND a clear camo (like the CCC, and camo-lux) I've read and heard that the clear lines are the best choice for sunny days and clear water, whereas the clear-camo work best for dark days and colored water.
Also wondering if anyone has experience with other brands of intermediate.
 
About 20 years ago I found a deal on a Cortland intermediate line in “ice blue” color. I was replacing one of the original RIO Aqualux lines that I wore out. It was a bit of a test to see if going with a non-clear line would be an issue. It wasn’t. My take…slow sink rate and a longer leader are the key. Color of the line is not much of a factor in the waters I fish. When my current SA clear camo intermediate line fails, I will replace it with a Cortland intermediate in forest green.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top