The Large King Aquaz fit is different than my size Large Redington waist waders.I'll let you know in about a week. 6 months ago my feet were measured at 11.5" with a ruler, but were measured a Brannock 11.5+ (12) EE-4E & Foot Scan 11.5 D, 11.6 DD at an Orthopedic shoe shop. Afterwards I bought all new shoes that have anatomically correct toe boxes fitted in 12-12.5, which really got me spoiled. I also just got some new Korkers River Ops lace ups size 13 and as of a trip last week I finally have "happy feet" while wading after several years of moderate discomfort.
I'm a Large in Aquaz because of the 32"- 33" inseam and the size 10-12 neoprene stockingfoot for my my size 11.5-12 feet. I'm a LK because of my middle If I'm wearing any insulation.
The Aquaz waist is cut 3" ~lower than the Redington.
The Aquaz inseam is about 1" longer than the Redington and is a little longer than how trousers fit on me. As a result they bunch up a little just above the knees. It's pretty noticeable I think because the Aquaz legs are 5-layer and the Redington legs are 3 layer.
The Aquaz has 5 belt loops and a lightweight web belt with a cheap flimsy buckle instead of the Redington's stretch belt with velcro fasteners on the sides. I may replace it with a GI rigger's belt.
The thin "too much stretch" suspenders that attach to the belt loops are just like the Redington's and may get replaced with Helly-Hanson ski bib suspenders.
My size 13 River Ops boots slide on & off over the Aquaz size 10 - 12 - 4mm neoprene wader feet very easy.
And finally my $IMM$ G3 jacket extends well below the Aquaz waist when sitting
*Adding, the Aquaz didn't come with a mesh stuff sack like both pairs my Redington waders did so I'll use the Redington bag.
All in all, they are very nice waders and I think they're going to work well. I hope to see how well tomorrow.
Last edited: