Chinook observed in Klamath River tributary above Iron Gate

It's irresponsible to leave man-made dead end irrigation canals open to salmon entrainment. Maybe the conservation organizations should initiate a lawsuit against the federal and state signatories to the agreement to remind them they have an obligation to screen those irrigation diversions.
Thanks, that's what I thought but I have never been involved in that type of project.

After getting the KPFA agreement signed the Gov(s), legislature(s), and ODFW doing their victory dance and patting themselves on the back so hard made them forget they still had to fund and complete the screens.

Maybe the conservation organizations should initiate a lawsuit against the federal and state signatories
That might be what water manager Scott White was implying with "pushing buttons".
 
The perceived rapid recolonization of the Upper Klamath Basin has caught everyone by surprise. I'm not sure who's responsible for the screens but most of us Oregonians know that ODFW has gone through some severe budget cuts. Perhaps they already have dollars allocated or encumbered. The water users in the Klamath Basin are under no financial obligation to pay to screen their diversions per the KBRA.

California has a screen shop in Yreka (Siskiyou County) which is maybe 90 miles from KFalls. CA DFW also has a whole division within the engineering branch that designs screens for agricutural diversions. Oregon has a screen shop in Central Point which is only an hour or so west of the Basin. If Oregon's shop is like Californias, they aren't really set up to build screens for larger diversions and canals.

If the gears are just now starting to turn towards grants for large fish screens - two years is probably the soonest it would take from funding to design to fabrication to installation. These are large CFS diversions (Ady Canal can run up to 250 CFS) and screening them can be both technically challenging and expensive.
 
Last edited:
https://www.instagram.com/active_norcal/

"Just over a year after four hydroelectric dams were removed from the Klamath River, biologists are seeing something many thought they might never witness again: salmon returning to nearly every corner of their historic habitat.

CDFW scientists report fall-run Chinook salmon spreading throughout newly accessible tributaries, reoccupying areas that had been blocked for more than a century. “There are salmon everywhere on the landscape right now,” said Michael Harris, Environmental Program Manager for CDFW’s Klamath Watershed Program. “The speed of their return is remarkable.”

Although final population numbers won’t be available until January, early reports indicate a stronger fall-run Chinook return than last year. The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife and the Klamath Tribes are documenting widespread spawning far upstream, including tributaries above Klamath Lake where salmon have been absent for generations.

In California, fish-counting stations have already recorded 208 adult Chinook in Jenny Creek and 260 in Shovel Creek—streams that were previously blocked by reservoirs. Snorkel surveys also found juvenile Chinook and steelhead in nearly all newly opened tributaries. One of the most promising signs came from Fall Creek, where roughly 65,000 wild juvenile Chinook were counted this summer.

The new Fall Creek Fish Hatchery is also seeing success, spawning 1.27 million eggs so far, four times last year’s output.

Dam removal has also restored natural water temperatures, cooled the river earlier in the fall, reduced harmful algal blooms, and dramatically lowered levels of the deadly parasite C. shasta."
 
These are large CFS diversions (Ady Canal can run up to 250 CFS) and screening them can be both technically challenging and expensive.
Some of the screens on the Yakima River system screen up to 1,000 cfs. I didn't really mean to diss CA or OR screen shops, but due to the Columbia and Snake River dams, we have some really big ass screens in the NW. And yes to it taking about 2 years for funding approval, design, and construction for large screens. In WA, those 2-year processes were often preceded by 10 to 15 years of arguing and legal proceedings. Sadly it often takes major ass kicking to get good work started.
 
Some of the screens on the Yakima River system screen up to 1,000 cfs. I didn't really mean to diss CA or OR screen shops, but due to the Columbia and Snake River dams, we have some really big ass screens in the NW. And yes to it taking about 2 years for funding approval, design, and construction for large screens. In WA, those 2-year processes were often preceded by 10 to 15 years of arguing and legal proceedings. Sadly it often takes major ass kicking to get good work started.
The underlined sentence is, sadly, very sadly, so true.
 
I pulled this excerpt from the Review of 2025 Ocean Salmon Fisheries document referencing last fall's return of chinook above the old Iron Gate Dam site. The escapement to natural spawning areas within the entire watershed was 39,860 fall chinook adults, which was 205 percent of the preseason prediction of 19,417 adults. The estimated 2025 return of over 12,000 fish above the dam footprint is quite impressive.

In 2024, four dams were removed from the Klamath River which allowed salmon to move
volitionally upstream from the site of Iron Gate Dam for the first time in many years. Newly
available mainstem and tributary habitats were occupied by salmon following dam removal.
Substantial monitoring efforts in Oregon and California provided age-specific spawner estimates
for the 2025 run. The estimated run size in the Klamath mainstem and its tributaries above Iron
Gate was 11,722 adults and 341 jacks in 2025.
 
Does anyone know when/if spring chinook are expected to show above the dam? I remember seeing an article about juveniles being released in UKL/tribs to do migration studies before the dams were removed, but idk if they were large enough releases to have any come back or how long ago they started.
 
Does anyone know when/if spring chinook are expected to show above the dam? I remember seeing an article about juveniles being released in UKL/tribs to do migration studies before the dams were removed, but idk if they were large enough releases to have any come back or how long ago they started.
If I recall correctly - the releases were mostly made to see if juvenile springers would be able to move through Upper Klamath Lake to the fish ladder at Link Dam. This occurred in 2023 before the dams were removed. The ladder at Link Dam was not designed to pass juvenile salmonids so it will need to be modified. Ditto for Keno Dam. Both were originally designed and constructed for passing Lost River and shortnose suckers. Plans are in the works to address this.
 
it just didn't have the same "OOMPH". I don't know what he meant when he said it was the same but in reference to my previous post, that was why I ended up just ordering a pizza when the grill wouldn't start. I was thinking STEAK!!!!!

This was all before the run into town for that replacement line and a 12 pack.
 
The first PIT tagged adult spring run chinook has been detected in the Upper Klamath Watershed. This is an unintended consequence of ODFW's migration studies which occurred just prior to dam removal. This fish (and possibly others) would have had to have been outmigrating during the dam removal process. First Springer
 
Back
Top