Brady was a different cat. He won with some bad offensive supporting casts. It's important to not turn the ball over.Pats have a lot more problems than just a QB. Not even sure Brady could carry that team.
Funny, I was just taking a break and reading the Boston Globe. One writer made the case that if the Pats had Joe Flacco, they'd have 7 wins. I tend to agree. I thing they are a .500 team with Geno Smith/ Flacco /Minshew at QB. It's hard to overstate how bad Jones has been. He is the statistical equivalent of Zach Wilson. Wilson is a QB for the Jets! The Jets QB!
Having said that, the Pats are a bad offensive football team with a lot of holes to fill. They are a very good to great defensive football team. All of their issues are on one side of the ball. Even with the limited offensive talent, they are a .500 team with average QB play or just a QB that doesn't throw it to the wrong team repeatedly. Anything above that and who knows. I'm not saying that Mahomes or Jackson gets them to the SB but they may get them to the 2nd round.
That is the thing with QB's. Either you have one or you don't and you are not going to be a contender without a very good one. All of the division leaders have a QB that is playing as a top 10 QB except the Bucs who are 7-7. Tua, Purdy, Prescott, Goff, Mahomes, Jackson, Lawrence, Mayfield.
I understand that you can make the case that those QB's numbers are good due to their surrounding cast. Tua and Purdy have some excellent players around them for sure, but both limit their int's. The fact is though that there are no 9-10 win teams who have not had excellent QB play. Ask anyone who watches NE or the Jets how important the position is. Both have excellent defenses but without a QB you are screwed. They hold the ball in their hands after all.