Alaska Native group protects land coveted by Pebble Mine developers (WAPO)

kmudgn

Life of the Party


Exclusive: Alaska Native group finalizes protections for its land, dealing blow to Pebble Mine​


Knutson Bay in Pedro Bay, Alaska. (Bri Dwyer/Conservation Fund) (Photo by Bri Dwyer courtesy of the Conservation Fund)
An Alaska Native group on Thursday will announce that more than 44,000 acres of land near Bristol Bay, the site of the world’s largest wild salmon fishery, are off limits to future development, according to details shared exclusively with The Climate 202.

The move will make it harder for the developers of the proposed Pebble Mine to build a road across the land, posing another setback for the controversial gold and copper mine that the Environmental Protection Agency is already considering blocking.




The details:
Pedro Bay Corp., an Alaska Native group that owns land near Bristol Bay, announced last year that nearly 90 percent of its shareholders voted to let the Conservation Fund, an environmental nonprofit organization, buy conservation easements on more than 44,000 acres.
The corporation will reveal on Thursday that a successful $20 million, 18-month fundraising effort enabled the Conservation Fund to purchase three conservation easements on the land. The new protections cover a portion of the proposed mining road, which would be used to transport ore.
  • The protections also cover the most productive spawning and rearing habitats for sockeye salmon within the Iliamna Lake watersheds.
  • Half of the funding was provided by the Wyss Foundation, Patagonia’s Holdfast Collective and Alaska Venture Fund. (The specific dollar amounts of the individual contributions were not disclosed.)
“Protecting this last great stronghold for salmon is critically important for the health of the marine resources, the land, and the people who live in the Bristol Bay region,” Larry Selzer, president and chief executive of the Conservation Fund, told The Climate 202.
“It’s important to recognize that mining is a valuable economic activity and provides benefits to society that can’t be derived in any other way,” Selzer added. “However, not all projects should be approved. And the Pebble Mine is the wrong mine in the wrong place: up high in the watershed above the greatest salmon stronghold in the world.”

The fate of Bristol Bay has been contested for more than a decade. While many of Alaska’s elected officials have supported mining there, an unusual coalition of environmentalists, Republicans, fishermen and Alaska Natives helped persuade the Trump administration to deny a key permit for the Pebble Mine in 2020.




Pebble Limited Partnership, the U.S. subsidiary of the Canadian company behind the Pebble Mine, has argued that the project would provide economic benefits for the region and the state.
Asked for comment, Pebble Limited Partnership spokesman Mike Heatwole said in an email: “We respect the rights of Alaska Native corporation shareholders to make decisions about what to do on their lands and hope the Biden Administration will do the same for other Alaska Native corporation shareholders who may have differing views about what they would like do on their lands, especially regarding the Pebble Project.”

EPA’s potential veto​

The Pebble Mine faces another potential challenge from the Biden administration. Casey Sixkiller, the EPA’s Region 10 administrator, announced Dec. 1 that he sent a recommendation to the agency’s headquarters to protect the Bristol Bay watershed by vetoing the project.




“This action would help protect salmon fishery areas that support world-class commercial and recreational fisheries, and that have sustained Alaska Native communities for thousands of years,” Sixkiller said in a statement.
Radhika Fox, who leads the EPA’s Office of Water, has 60 days to consider the recommendation. She could issue the veto, modify it, or reject it entirely.
“Hopefully these easements send a message that the local people who live here do not want this [mine] and it encourages the EPA to follow through with what they’ve been trying to do for well over a decade,” said Tim Troll, executive director of the Bristol Bay Heritage Land Trust.

Maria Michalos, an EPA spokeswoman, confirmed in an email that the agency expects to make a final decision by Jan. 30.

Patagonia’s role​

The new protections were made possible, in part, by Patagonia founder Yvon Chouinard’s unconventional approach to capitalism.



  • In September, Chouinard announced that he was giving away the outdoor apparel maker, valued at about $3 billion, and declared that “Earth is now our only shareholder.”
  • Chouinard and his family transferred their ownership of Patagonia to a specially designed trust as well as the Holdfast Collective, a nonprofit organization dedicated to combating climate change and environmental destruction.
  • As one of its first grants, the Holdfast Collective contributed to the fundraising effort that enabled the new protections near Bristol Bay.
Patagonia spokeswoman Corley Kenna noted that the company, which has a long history of environmental activism, has supported groups working to protect the region since 2006.
“Stopping any further development in Bristol Bay is exactly the kind of thing that we want to do because it gets at the roots of both the climate and ecological crises,” Kenna said.

 
Fingers crossed…I’ve been blessed to have the ability to fish in this region the last 5 years, and support any and all opposition to the Pebble Mine and the Canadian owner Northern Dynasty Minerals…
 
This news is good news, anyone who thinks otherwise doesn't really give a shit about fish. Mining sucks and is always rough on the environment. Every single mine has buckets of promises about how good it will be and how careful it will be and how they will be so gentle on the environment. And virtually every single mine has accidents that fuck shit up because humans are fallible and mother nature is unpredictable. The risk that this mine would cause to an irreplaceable river/salmon system is unacceptable.

Mining is also a necessary evil because we need minerals to make the modern world run. Can't have all of these fancy phones and computers and cars (even the gas ones) without cobalt and lithium and gold. Hell, where do you think the tungsten for our sinking lines and deep nymph flies comes from? Yes, mining happens in 3rd world countries and some of those mines probably shouldn't exist. But you don't fix those problems with something like the Pebble Mine. You don't improve things by continuing to make bad choices. Like our grandparents always told us, two wrongs don't make a right.

The way out of this mess is better recycling technology. But sadly, we're not there yet. The tech we have is problematic in its own way as far as danger to workers and environmental risks. But with more research and effort and will, we'll see improvement. When it becomes more profitable to recycle instead of digging mines, we'll figure out how to do it.

Bottom line, I have far more faith that we can figure out how to recapture/recycle the minerals we've already mined and use them again than I do that we can figure out how to restore a destroyed salmon run. We have plenty of evidence that recycling tech can work. We have zero evidence that we can make a river whole again. I mean, just ask any WA steelheader how that's going for rivers around here.
 
Really? Pitons and micro plastic shedding fleece vs. Tesla, Space X, and Starlink. Give me a break.
sure, consider yourself broken...3 billion donated to enviromental causes vs. an ego maniac who wants to control free speech, run companies with zero disregard to labor law, and hangs with dictators and traitors.
The end product is not more important than how it's created.
 
My money is on Elon or another contemporary mining our needed precious metals from asteroids.
 
Back
Top