Dry Falls Fishing Dried Up?

Guy Le Fly

Older But Not Wiser
Forum Supporter
A question for the group: Any recent reports to share from Dry Falls? I experienced surprisingly very poor fishing last year and a recent report from a fellow angler who has been there several times this year the same. He indicated he is hesitant to go back.

It seems numbers of catchable fish are way down despite regular stocking of fingerlings. Any other reports out there?

I no longer see the crowds there, confirming the above. Thanks in advance!
 
Nobody goes there anymore…it’s too crowded. It was packed on my last visit in April. It’s getting warm now. Warmer than I like for trout. The fishing is always challenging. If you can figure out other popular fisheries you can find fish at DF.
 
The hay days started fading away about 2000 time frame, used to be a stable n good fishery up until 05',then water level started dropping,hatches became few. Sad deal it's a great place..
Have since found much better around the state. time n research can have its rewards .
 
There was a time they put a good number of triploids in there. In my opinion, it never fished as well afterwards. That was maybe 20 years ago. I don’t think it was just the triploids, as other things were also causes of the decline. I haven’t fished it in a number of years but the last few times I did it didn’t fish well.
SF
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zak
Nobody goes there anymore…it’s too crowded. It was packed on my last visit in April. It’s getting warm now. Warmer than I like for trout. The fishing is always challenging. If you can figure out other popular fisheries you can find fish at DF.
Thanks for the report. I didn't get a chance to get out earlier this year.
 
There was a time they put a good number of triploids in there. In my opinion, it never fished as well afterwards. That was maybe 20 years ago. I don’t think it was just the triploids, as other things were also causes of the decline. I haven’t fished it in a number of years but the last few times I did it didn’t fish well.
SF
Pretty sure it was NOT due to the triploid stocking. See next reply
The hay days started fading away about 2000 time frame, used to be a stable n good fishery up until 05',then water level started dropping,hatches became few. Sad deal it's a great place..
The drop in water levels dried out the "pond" next to the deep water. Once the "cafeteria" closed, the fishing started going downhill.
Back in the day it was awesome with browns, rainbows and tigers….the good old days. Sure sucks I can say that already at my age….
Awesome is definitely defined by ones age. I never thought Dry Falls to be "awesome", it was a good lake, but while the fishing was enjoyable it never matched Chopaka or Nunnally in their day.

I have heard "young bucks" talk about "awesome" days at lakes these days and it is definitely a different definition of "awesome".

I did fish it a lot prior to the Discover Pass being required.

It was a good lake on windy days to get out of the wind. In the fall, while bird hunting in the morning Dry Falls was a good lake to fish in the afternoon after walking dozens of miles.

One November day, I did get the stock tip of the century at Dry Falls, but figured what does a pilot and two stewardesses know about buying out a airline. Technically, overhearing their conversation was a violation of SEC laws, but the SEC would have had a hard time figuring out where I got the insider information!!!

I don't understand why the water level dropped at Dry Falls, since I assume it is fed by water from Banks Lake flowing below ground.

Does anybody know what changed at Banks Lake and its operation that would have resulted in Dry Falls lake levels dropping??
 
Pretty sure it was NOT due to the triploid stocking. See next reply

The drop in water levels dried out the "pond" next to the deep water. Once the "cafeteria" closed, the fishing started going downhill.

Awesome is definitely defined by ones age. I never thought Dry Falls to be "awesome", it was a good lake, but while the fishing was enjoyable it never matched Chopaka or Nunnally in their day.

I have heard "young bucks" talk about "awesome" days at lakes these days and it is definitely a different definition of "awesome".

I did fish it a lot prior to the Discover Pass being required.

It was a good lake on windy days to get out of the wind. In the fall, while bird hunting in the morning Dry Falls was a good lake to fish in the afternoon after walking dozens of miles.

One November day, I did get the stock tip of the century at Dry Falls, but figured what does a pilot and two stewardesses know about buying out a airline. Technically, overhearing their conversation was a violation of SEC laws, but the SEC would have had a hard time figuring out where I got the insider information!!!

I don't understand why the water level dropped at Dry Falls, since I assume it is fed by water from Banks Lake flowing below ground.

Does anybody know what changed at Banks Lake and its operation that would have resulted in Dry Falls lake levels dropping??

As I mentioned, there were other causes. If triploids were so great though, how come they are no longer planted there?
Shortly after they planted them in DF fishing started to suck. Eastern WA lakes had great trout fishing before triploids ever became the in thing.
SF
 
Quality over Quantity these days at DFL.

The fish do play hard to get, but when you are lucky enough to hook into a couple, watch out! The reduction of the crowds has made it a real pleasant lake to wet a line these days, but it can be far and few between fish. I wouldn't consider it worse that it used to be, just different.

It is now a true trophy fishery in my opinion, and a challenging one at that.

Peach
 
I had great fun fishing for triploids in lots of eastern Washington lakes.

Here is AI's answer:

You said: Selective fishery lakes why are they no longer stocked with triploids?


WDFW still stocks select quality and selective-gear lakes with triploids, but the department has significantly scaled back triploid stocking in selective fishery lakes to optimize budgets and match the biological purpose of these waters. [1, 2]
The shift away from heavily stocking triploids in selective-gear lakes involves several biological and management factors:

1. Cost Efficiency and "Put-Grow-Take" Dynamics [1]
  • High Purchase Costs: Unlike standard trout, WDFW must purchase triploids from commercial growers like Troutlodge. This makes them a costly premium resource. [1, 2, 3, 4]
  • Natural Growth Potential: Selective fishery lakes utilize Selective Gear Rules (no bait, single barbless hooks) and strict limits to let fish grow naturally. Biologists realized it is a waste of budget to stock expensive, pre-grown 1.5-pound triploids into lakes that have the natural forage to grow cheap fingerlings into trophy-sized fish on their own. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

2. Native Trout Protection (The Shift to Resident Native Policy)
  • Aggressive Feeding Competition: Triploids do not spend energy on reproduction, so they eat voraciously and grow rapidly. In selective waters managed for native species—such as Westslope Cutthroat or Redband trout—large triploid rainbows can outcompete native juveniles for food and prime habitat. [1, 2, 3]
  • Disruptive Spawning Behavior: While triploids are 100% sterile and cannot cross-breed, mature triploids still undergo hormonal changes, develop spawning colors, and attempt to dig redds (nests). This behavior physically disrupts the spawning process of wild, native trout sharing the same gravel beds. [1, 2, 3, 4]

3. Allocation to Lowland "Put-and-Take" Lakes
  • Maximizing Angler Return: Because triploids are highly aggressive feeders, they are incredibly easy to catch. WDFW shifted the majority of triploid stocking to high-harvest, family-friendly lowland lakes. This gives casual bait-and-gear anglers a better return on investment before the fish can be lost to natural mortality. [1, 2]

4. Transition to In-House "Jumbos"
  • Hatchery Rebalancing: Over the last decade, WDFW expanded its internal rearing programs to produce "Jumbo" rainbow trout (1- to 3-pound fish) and retired broodstock. Because WDFW raises these in state-owned hatcheries, they are more cost-effective to produce than buying triploids from commercial farms.
And then there is the response from the Department.....

The response I got from WDFW,

WDFW went into the 2017 legislative session with an identified shortfall of $27 million to provide the same services and products that we had in the previous biennium. At that time, we requested an increase in license fees to offset the increased cost of living and inflation, as the agency had not had a license fee increase since 2011. The legislature did not approve a fee increase due in part to a lack of support by hunters and anglers. They did provide a one-time budget increase of $10 million. That left WDFW with a hole of $17 million to fill. The agency was able to cover some of that with one time fund shifts and reductions in staff, but we were unable to cover it all. Therefore a number of services and products were cut to make up the difference. The triploid trout program was one of those cuts, as was a reduction in our lake rehabilitation program. As we move forward into the next biennium (beginning July of 2019), we will be facing a shortfall in excess of $30 million. If the legislature does not provide additional funds to the agency, the triploid program, along with many other services and programs will be in jeopardy. I’m sure it isn’t a message you want to hear, but it is the harsh reality of our current budget situation. As we are currently working in the 2019 legislative session, we could use support for increased funding to WDFW from anglers (and hunters) like yourself. I hope you will let your legislators know how important this resource is to you and that the agency needs to be funded at a level that allows it to continue to provide services and products.



WDFW is still raising over 16 million trout annually to support robust fisheries throughout the state, and the opening day of trout season is still the single busiest fishing day of the year. The annual freshwater fishing license at $30 continues to be a tremendous value to anglers.
 
Actually, those were the days of the timber program on public lands. So the roads were in good shape. They were not closed ten miles from the nearest lake like today.

Particularly living in Idaho in the 70's you could drive within a couple of miles of not one but several alpine lakes and then hike in on a well maintained trail to multiple lakes. Idaho in the 70's was "free" of people, so if you got to one trailhead and found a rig parked there, you went to the next one so you did not crowd folks.

The fishing was good and easy in the alpine lakes. Idaho just went to catch and release on many streams for native cutts so the fishing was really good given the light pressure and the catch and release regs.

People will find this hard to believe, but when I lived in Coeur d'Alene I bought a Washington fishing license because the trout fishing was much better here than in Idaho.

I would fish Chopaka in late September on my birthday and always had the lake to myself. Fifty fish day averaging 19 to 20 inches on the fish. The other lakes in the state were just as good. I miss those days.

Nope, it was more like downhill both ways.
 
I'm in...

Gotta start with old guys first, before they're not around to tell the tales of piscatorial prizes of the past.

I'll interview salmo...just let me get a soundtrack of soft flute music for the background, and good to go.
 
Do we need a 'Back in the Day' section?
I am not a fan of "back in the day".

As a forester, much more interested in then and now comparison. The quality of the natural environment has gone downhill significantly in the past 30 years, particularly the fishing.

I fished more lakes when I was working. Most of my fishing trips were day trips so it was easy to fish a different lake every weekend. After I retired, I ended up camping and fishing for a minimum of three days. That limited the number of lakes that I fished and I tended to focus on lake with good camping and no private homes around them.

I am thinking about fishing every lake I fished EVER in the past next year. Just making a circuit and comparing the results.
 
Pretty sure it was NOT due to the triploid stocking. See next reply

The drop in water levels dried out the "pond" next to the deep water. Once the "cafeteria" closed, the fishing started going downhill.

Awesome is definitely defined by ones age. I never thought Dry Falls to be "awesome", it was a good lake, but while the fishing was enjoyable it never matched Chopaka or Nunnally in their day.

I have heard "young bucks" talk about "awesome" days at lakes these days and it is definitely a different definition of "awesome".

I did fish it a lot prior to the Discover Pass being required.

I just turned 70…..how about you 509? I fished there since the late 60’s.
 
Back
Top