A limited entry "raffle" system sure seems like a slippery slope and IMO isn't a great look for anglers.
On one hand it seems most anglers agree that sport fishing has little to no impact on fish numbers, yet still when faced with closures some would be willing to pay extra for the "privilege" of fishing over these same fish that most agree we have no impact on in the first place? Doesn't make a lot of sense in my book.
On one hand it seems most anglers agree that sport fishing has little to no impact on fish numbers, yet still when faced with closures some would be willing to pay extra for the "privilege" of fishing over these same fish that most agree we have no impact on in the first place? Doesn't make a lot of sense in my book.