NFR No thank you

Non-fishing related
I don't think it's unfortunate at all. He'd been warned multiple times by experts in the industry that the vessel wasn't safe. He shrugged it off and thought he knew better....he didn't.
He literally fired anyone in the company that brought it up. He specifically avoided hiring actual experts.

The issue wasn't so much that it couldn't make a single dive, it was that he was told it would fail after a couple trips.
 
People will always push boundaries. Safety is taken into account but sometimes corners are cut. Someone mentioned the paid space flights and the possibility something may happen on one of those someday.
Remember the Concorde and it’s demise? Could this be the modern day version?
SF

 
People will always push boundaries. Safety is taken into account but sometimes corners are cut. Someone mentioned the paid space flights and the possibility something may happen on one of those someday.
Remember the Concorde and it’s demise? Could this be the modern day version?
SF

20230627_063935.jpg
Uhhhhh...could be.😁
 
Can this at least be a note to performance parts manufacturers and enthusiasts of different types that carbon fiber is not always the preferred material for every single application.
 
Can this at least be a note to performance parts manufacturers and enthusiasts of different types that carbon fiber is not always the preferred material for every single application.


They make great pillows.....after the 100,000 cycle/usage. Soft like a bunny.
 
Well, one of the sons put up an IG post smiling pic at a Blink 182 concert while the search was ongoing. Apparently the teenage son that died with his dad was terrified but went as a fathers day gift.

Kinda makes you wonder about the family life of billionaires. I'm guessing most of them aren't around for their family much. Guess their money will be though.

I wouldn't have a relationship with my son either if he were a blink 182 fan.
 
OK, so I ran across this tasteless dark humor, but damn, it made me laugh so thought I would share. Then consider the source.

WASHINGTON—Analyzing the mistakes OceanGate made that led to the vessel’s disappearance, critics told reporters Thursday that the submersible should have been tested with poorer passengers first. “The company skipped the very crucial step of sending five lower-class people to the bottom of the ocean to make sure it was safe enough for the wealthy,” said Otto Scofield, a member of the Marine Technology Society, adding that no one with a net worth above $50,000 should have been in the submersible. “OceanGate made the mistake of not using minimum wage workers and unemployed people on government welfare programs to test the seaworthiness of the craft, which was not billionaire-ready. Running more trials with some homeless people would have made all the difference, and the deaths of several wealthy people could have been prevented.” Scofield continued that using children of color from impoverished families would have been ideal as more would have been able to fit inside the submersible.

https://www.theonion.com/critics-say-submersible-should-ve-been-tested-with-poor-1850566314
Since people are posting jokes now, here's mine:

Last transmission from the Titan:

"What do you mean,"We forgot the bilge plug."?"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zak
Stockton Rush, founder and CEO of OceanGate and pilot of the crushed submersible, was part of the engineering team that designed and built the Titan submersible. He appears to have had substantial technical skills. As such, he would have been well-aware of the strengths and weaknesses of this craft. From transcripts of interviews that I have read over the last few days, he would NOT be characterized as cautious. At some level, that is fine if only his life was on the line. Adults are allowed to make risky choices (I fly fish; others use wingsuits or sky-dive...), especially if they are aware of the potential risks. But there is NO WAY that the paying passengers would be able to make their own assessment of risk. They were relying on Rush's assessment.

Where things change, IMO, is when he starts selling that experience to others who are no doubt banking on what they assume is his expertise to get them through the trip safely. Did those passengers know they were signing up for great risk, of course. But I have to assume that much of the decision to go was based on the assurance that this guy had taken the necessary steps and had the expertise to make the trip as safely as could be accomplished. Info coming out now sure paints a much different picture of him.

The OceanGate RELEASE OF LIABILITY AGREEMENT form is out on the web now. Yes the clients (IMHO victims) signed a form that stated 9 times that an expedition could result in death, and agreed if they die they waive the right to take legal action. Titan had completed a few dives and I understand that from the corporate perspective there are unknown risks that might include the effect that pressure-contraction-expansion cycles could have on the integrity of carbon fiber, the use of dissimilar materials, and using an adhesive to secure the "titanium ring", etc.

The agreement also states "The experimental submersible vessel has not been approved or certified by any regulatory body..." But the agreement has this one little section:
"I acknowledge that representatives of OceanGate Expeditions, Ltd., have been available to answer my questions and more fully explain to me the physical demands of the operation as well as the risks, hazards, and dangers associated with the operation." Were the following risks either resolved to the satisfaction an unanimous agreement by all company personnel or were passengers fully informed and acknowledged these serious risks that had been or were still concerns within the company had been resolved?
(As described in the litigation with fired OceanGate Director of Marine Operations)
  • The fabricator of the viewing port could only guarantee its use to 1300 meters, but that the Titanic is at 4000 meters
  • Or "that non-destructive testing had never been performed on the Titan’s hull, including between dives as periodic seaworthiness inspections, checking for “delaminations, porosity and voids of sufficient adhesion of the glue being used due to the thickness of the hull” (even if there was no known way to do so)?
Or that there were concerns amongst OceanGate engineers that they had expected the hull to be seven inches thick, but the hull had only been built to five inches thick?

I am not an attorney but I suspect that withholding pertinent known risks from clients would be considered acting in bad faith, and gross negligence, which could render the agreement unenforceable.
A follow-on investigation may even find employees criminally liable.
 
Among others, BBC News has reported on Mr. Rush’s attitude to safety.

Quotes from. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65998914
“In messages seen by the BBC, Rob McCallum told OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush that he was potentially putting his clients at risk and urged him to stop using the sub until it had been certified by an independent agency.
Mr Rush responded that he was "tired of industry players who try to use a safety argument to stop innovation".

”"We have heard the baseless cries of 'you are going to kill someone' way too often," he wrote. "I take this as a serious personal insult."

Video clip of Mr. McCallum’s interview with the BBC:
 
Since people are posting jokes now, here's mine:

Last transmission from the Titan:

"What do you mean,"We forgot the bilge plug."?"

That's no joke. If I had a kid that was into blink 182 I would disown him. What kid? I won't have my family name associated with such stupidity.
 
I think the sub company was using similar design engineers as those who built the Hindenburg...
 
I have a friend that is a very experienced diver and oceanographer. She went down in a previous OceanGate model here in the NW. Went down to 400' and when she got back up and out of that thing she said never again. In fact, she was regretting going down while still onboard. That dive plus having been around Stockton Rush, including events at his house, convinced her the dude was too much of a cowboy. Too many corners cut.

I think Brian is right. I gotta think a big lawsuit is coming regardless of the waiver. If he cut corners on development and construction, he probably did the same thing when hiring the legal team.

Praying for all the sad family members and friends that are left in the wake of this horrible (and avoidable) tragedy. Arrogance can be so destructive.
 
Last edited:
I think sometimes we put a lot of faith in things/people believing they know what’s up.
Sometimes we’re wrong
Sometimes with dire consequences
 
I think sometimes we put a lot of faith in things/people believing they know what’s up.
Sometimes we’re wrong
Sometimes with dire consequences

Totally agree. Look at all the people who actually trust politicians. There's an innate need to trust what is thought to be authority. It takes the effort of thinking away which is hard for some. Just trust the authority on submarines. He's rich. He must know what he's doing.
 
Totally agree. Look at all the people who actually trust politicians. There's an innate need to trust what is thought to be authority. It takes the effort of thinking away which is hard for some. Just trust the authority on submarines. He's rich. He must know what he's doing.
Exactly
And sometimes we’re taken advantage of
 
Whatever failed........whoever was at fault...........the implosion occurred so quickly, so violently that they didn't even know what happened; no pain, no thoughts, just instantaneous death:
<>
 
Back
Top