NFR Screening for Cardiovascular Disease

Non-fishing related

DimeBrite

Saltwater fly fisherman
Forum Supporter
***A post for those concerned about their risk of heart disease and how to understand it before agreeing to medication. I'm not a medical doctor or a cardiologist, just a person who wants to live an active life.

Most men start up their annual doctor visits in their 40s or 50s, hopefully before any medical issues arise. Blood is drawn, weight and blood pressure is measured, balance & reflexes tested. Quick, boring, and marginally informative of your risk of serious disease.

But... what should you make of your cholesterol, triglyceride, and glucose level numbers? Do you have a potential issue with cardiovascular disease, the #1 male cause of death? Should you be prescribed a cholesterol lowering medication and take it for the rest of your life,... just in case 😕? Or is a healthy diet, adequate sleep, regular exercise, normal weight, no nicotine, no alcohol, and normal blood pressure sufficient to mitigate your risk?

To directly determine my risk of coronary artery disease, I requested a Coronary CT Angiogram (CCTA).


The procedure first scanned for calcified plaque in my coronary arteries (CAC calcium score). Then a second scan used a contrast agent to measure "soft plaque" accumulation in my coronary arteries (CAD-RADS score). My appointment took about 90 minutes, but a couple days later I received my results.

I had no detectable coronary artery disese: CAC score = 0, CAD-RADS = 0. My probability of a heart attack in the next 10 years is extremely low.
This was a relief, because my father died of a massive heart attack in his early 60s. I have always tested in the "high" cholesterol LDL range, despite having low triglycerides and low glucose levels (not prediabetic). My doctors had been pressing me for years to take a high dose statin drug and possibly an expensive antibody therapeutic. I declined these drugs several times in the past. Following my CCTA test results, my doctors dropped their prescription requests. I had no disease to treat.

The reason I posted this is because I believe in preventative medicine. A CCTA scan is the best test to inform you and your doctors of your coronary artery disease risk. Cholesterol testing is insufficient to judge your risk. A low-moderate cholesterol score does not mean you have healthy coronary arteries, especially if you are prediabetic.

The cost of a CCTA is in the several hundreds depending on your medical insurance. That is far cheaper than taking a lifetime of cholesterol drugs you never needed or suffering the effects of a heart attack.

I hope this helps someone. Cheers!
 
Last edited:
I like Dimebrite have a family history of heart disease. My father had double bypass surgery at 59 and will be turning 90 in a few weeks. Since I like to fish alpine lakes and as a result do some pretty strenuous hikes. For peace of mind for myself and mt family plus not wanting to have a situation where my hiking partners would have to deal a situation of a heart issue in the back country, I too opted for some screening. I had two screens 1) a stress echocardiogram and 2) coronary calcium scan. The one Dimebrite had with the contrast agent wasn't mentioned to me. The 1st test was covered by my insurance and the 2nd not covered but only 125$. I agree with Dimebrite that having more information to guide your health decisions plus the peace of mind that your chance of having a serious event are low allows one to participate in activities without worries.
 
Wise move, DB, that is the gold standard.
Wife and I had CAC with negative results, the cardiologist would have had us go through CCTA if the tests had been positive with anything..'
Due to family histories, however, we both take statins as a preventive to reduce the chance of heart attack or stroke causing blood clots. If there are any side effects we don't notice them.
8 of us were in our young teenage posse of surfers starting out together, friends for decades...60+ years later only the three of us who prioritized fitness, reasonable diets, and either zero or moderate drink are still here.

"A Coronary CT Angiogram (CCTA) is a diagnostic test for symptomatic patients to visualize exact artery blockages and all types of plaque using IV contrast. A CT Calcium Scoring (CAC) test is a screening tool for asymptomatic individuals to measure calcified plaque and assess future heart attack risk without using contrast."
 
CT scans are amazing. In a hospital setting, they are a great tool to evaluate current issues being experienced. Do not ask me how I know with 9 in the last year.

Modern technology is amazing. Take advantage of it. It is a life saver!

With regards to statins, they may help a lot. I have been on them for 40+ years.. I have had 5 heart attacks since being on statins. I have outlived the effectiveness of 3 of them. Right now my test results are the best in over 40+ years and better than my younger doctors. I have had no side effects. That being said, i believe less pills the better. For example, my pre-diabetes is controlled thru diet.
 
Last edited:
I had some pretty bad muscle issues with my statin, adding CoQ10 to the mix helped resolve them.

Works for some, not for others, ask a doc if you think you're interested.
 
I have diabetes, runs in all the females on my dad's side of the family. Have a Libre 3+ to monitor the blood sugars with an app on my phone. Dr says I am doing good. Also take CoQ10 with my statin. take losartin for blood pressure, sometime the BP is too low. Lisinapril am allergic to it.
 
Back
Top