While Spring Chinook play a small part in our April fishery, the bulk of fish caught are yearling hatchery Chinook kept for a full year prior to release into rivers. This process for reasons currently unknown leaves the yearling fish with a tendency to remain within the Salish Sea for a period or for the entirety of their lives. Two and three salt fish seem to make up the bulk of our catch. The cost of these yearling fish is estimated to be a dollar per fish. With limited opportunity due to restrictive conservation management criteria of undersize and wild encounters, opportunity to fish for these yearling fish outside of the summer season is limited. For the last 4 years, it seems to have only ever lasted 4 days to a week.
The limited conservation impacts affect our summer fishing for larger migratory fish as well. With the WDFW budget getting smaller, I would prefer to see the exuberant amount of money used to raise these yearling fish be used to support monitoring and enforcement of other fisheries, or even expanded hatchery enhancement where it makes sense. The allowed impacts spent on this fishery would be more cost effective if spent on expanding our also dwindling summer opportunity.
Thanks for the reply. I don’t ever recall anyone being concerned with the cost per blackmouth when we had more opportunities like year around fishing. Those fish that aren’t caught in the spring also contribute to the summer fisheries.
Are you also concerned with the cost of the large numbers of returning surplus adult chinook hatchery fish you get very limited opportunities to fish for in the summer? Minter Creek had a chinook escapement that was basically twice the summer quota for MA 9 and MA 10 combined. That’s just one hatchery facility….
If you haven’t read this article before, you might find it interesting.
SF
Frank Haw Talks Salmon Issues
Frank Haw Reflects on a Storied Career, and How to Approach Today’s Salmon Issues By Pat Hoglund […]
Last edited:


